International journal of cardiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3102 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

International journal of cardiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Int J Cardiol
Abbreviated Name int j cardiol
ISSN 1874-1754
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/506041/description#
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2020
The cardiovascular burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a focus on congenital heart disease.
Tan, Weiyi;Aboulhosn, Jamil;
Vol. 309 , pp. 70-77
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Response: Arrhythmias 72 hour post strenuous exercise at a time when cardiac troponin was not elevated.
Wundersitz, Daniel;Nadurata, Voltaire;Lavie, Carl;Williamson, Jacqui;Nolan, Kimberly;Kingsley, Michael;
Vol. 292 , pp. 138
356 views DOI
2019
Comment on “Non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants are as safe and effective as warfarin for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis”
Jenabi, E.
Vol. 277 , pp. 139
352 views DOI
2019
New technologies, new disparities: The intersection of electronic health and digital health literacy
Smith, B.
Vol. 292 , pp. 280-282
336 views DOI
2020
A validation study of intraoperative performance metrics for training novice cardiac resynchronization therapy implanters.
Mascheroni, Jorio;Mont, Lluís;Stockburger, Martin;Patwala, Ashish;Retzlaff, Hartwig;Gallagher, Anthony G;
329 views DOI Abstract
2014
Influence of renal impairment on myocardial function in outpatients with systolic heart failure: an echocardiographic and cardiac biomarker study.
Bosselmann, Helle;Tonder, Niels;Sölétormos, György;Rossing, Kasper;Iversen, Kasper;Goetze, Jens P;Gustafsson, Finn;Schou, Morten;
Vol. 177 , No. 3 , pp. 942-8
328 views DOI Abstract
2017
Thyroid hormone biosynthesis machinery is altered in the ischemic myocardium: An epigenomic study.
Gil-Cayuela, Carolina;Roselló-LLetí, Esther;Tarazón, Estefanía;Ortega, Ana;Sandoval, Juan;Martínez-Dolz, Luis;Cinca, Juan;Jorge, Esther;González-Juanatey, José Ramón;Lago, Francisca;Rivera, Miguel;Portolés, Manuel;
Vol. 243 , pp. 27-33
323 views DOI Abstract
2011
Left sinus of valsalva aneurysm in an adult with congenital unicuspid aortic valve.
Ucak, Alper;Inan, Kaan;Onan, Burak;Temizkan, Veysel;Kilicaslan, Fethi;Yilmaz, Ahmet Turan;
Vol. 149 , No. 1 , pp. e21-3
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Best practices in digital health literacy
Conard, S.
Vol. 292 , pp. 277-279
291 views DOI Abstract
2013
Recurrence of cardiomyopathy by recurrent pheochromocytoma.
Baskok, Firdevs Aysenur Ekizler;Senturk, Bihter;Ozeke, Ozcan;Aras, Dursun;
Vol. 169 , No. 2 , pp. e31-2
288 views DOI
View All 21 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.