A validation study of intraoperative performance metrics for training novice cardiac resynchronization therapy implanters.
Clicks: 402
ID: 97793
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.3
/100
402 views
40 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #4 of 21 articles by views in International journal of cardiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Pacing/cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant training currently lacks a common system to objectively assess trainee ability to perform required tasks at predetermined performance levels. The purpose of this study was to primarily examine construct validity and reliability, secondarily discriminative validity of novel intraoperative performance metrics, developed for a reference approach to training novice CRT implanters.Fifteen novice and eleven experienced CRT implanters performed a 3-lead implant procedure on a virtual reality simulator. Performances were video-recorded, then independently scored using predefined metrics endorsed by an international panel of experts. First, Novice and Experienced group scores were compared for steps completed and errors made. Secondly, each group was split in two around the median score of the group and subgroup scores were compared.The mean number of scored metrics per performance was 108 and the inter-rater reliability for scoring was 0.947. Compared with novices, experienced implanters completed more procedural Steps correctly (mean 87% vs. 73%, p = 0.001), made fewer procedural Errors (6.3 vs. 11.2, p = 0.005), Critical Errors (1.8 vs. 4.4, p = 0.004), and total errors (8.1 vs. 15.6, p = 0.002). Furthermore, the differences between the two Novice subgroups were 25% for steps completed correctly and 94% for total errors made (p < 0.001); the differences between the two Experienced subgroups were respectively 16% and 191% (p < 0.001).The procedure metrics used in this study reliably distinguish novice and experienced CRT implanters' performances. The metrics further differentiated performance levels within a group with similar experience. These performance metrics will underpin quality-assured novice implanter training.
| Reference Key |
mascheroni2020ainternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Mascheroni, Jorio;Mont, Lluís;Stockburger, Martin;Patwala, Ashish;Retzlaff, Hartwig;Gallagher, Anthony G; |
| Journal | International journal of cardiology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
S0167-5273(20)30135-2
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.