PLoS genetics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#886 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

PLoS genetics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name PLoS Genet
Abbreviated Name plos genetics
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (68 total)

2019
Performing different kinds of physical exercise differentially attenuates the genetic effects on obesity measures: Evidence from 18,424 Taiwan Biobank participants.
Lin, Wan-Yu;Chan, Chang-Chuan;Liu, Yu-Li;Yang, Albert C;Tsai, Shih-Jen;Kuo, Po-Hsiu;
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1008277
443 views DOI Abstract
2014
Deep evolutionary comparison of gene expression identifies parallel recruitment of trans-factors in two independent origins of C4 photosynthesis.
Aubry, Sylvain;Kelly, Steven;Kümpers, Britta M C;Smith-Unna, Richard D;Hibberd, Julian M;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. e1004365-
406 views Abstract
2019
Increased vulnerability of nigral dopamine neurons after expansion of their axonal arborization size through D2 dopamine receptor conditional knockout.
Giguère, Nicolas;Delignat-Lavaud, Benoît;Herborg, Freja;Voisin, Aurore;Li, Yuan;Jacquemet, Vincent;Anand-Srivastava, Madhu;Gether, Ulrik;Giros, Bruno;Trudeau, Louis-Éric;
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1008352
392 views DOI Abstract
2017
The creation and selection of mutations resistant to a gene drive over multiple generations in the malaria mosquito.
Hammond, Andrew M;Kyrou, Kyros;Bruttini, Marco;North, Ace;Galizi, Roberto;Karlsson, Xenia;Kranjc, Nace;Carpi, Francesco M;D'Aurizio, Romina;Crisanti, Andrea;Nolan, Tony;
Vol. 13 , No. 10 , pp. e1007039-
380 views Abstract
2016
Phosphatidylserine Ameliorates Neurodegenerative Symptoms and Enhances Axonal Transport in a Mouse Model of Familial Dysautonomia.
Naftelberg, Shiran;Abramovitch, Ziv;Gluska, Shani;Yannai, Sivan;Joshi, Yuvraj;Donyo, Maya;Ben-Yaakov, Keren;Gradus, Tal;Zonszain, Jonathan;Farhy, Chen;Ashery-Padan, Ruth;Perlson, Eran;Ast, Gil;
Vol. 12 , No. 12 , pp. e1006486
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of >100,000 NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium whole genome sequences improves imputation quality and detection of rare variant associations in admixed African and Hispanic/Latino populations.
Kowalski, Madeline H;Qian, Huijun;Hou, Ziyi;Rosen, Jonathan D;Tapia, Amanda L;Shan, Yue;Jain, Deepti;Argos, Maria;Arnett, Donna K;Avery, Christy;Barnes, Kathleen C;Becker, Lewis C;Bien, Stephanie A;Bis, Joshua C;Blangero, John;Boerwinkle, Eric;Bowden, Donald W;Buyske, Steve;Cai, Jianwen;Cho, Michael H;Choi, Seung Hoan;Choquet, Hélène;Cupples, L Adrienne;Cushman, Mary;Daya, Michelle;de Vries, Paul S;Ellinor, Patrick T;Faraday, Nauder;Fornage, Myriam;Gabriel, Stacey;Ganesh, Santhi K;Graff, Misa;Gupta, Namrata;He, Jiang;Heckbert, Susan R;Hidalgo, Bertha;Hodonsky, Chani J;Irvin, Marguerite R;Johnson, Andrew D;Jorgenson, Eric;Kaplan, Robert;Kardia, Sharon L R;Kelly, Tanika N;Kooperberg, Charles;Lasky-Su, Jessica A;Loos, Ruth J F;Lubitz, Steven A;Mathias, Rasika A;McHugh, Caitlin P;Montgomery, Courtney;Moon, Jee-Young;Morrison, Alanna C;Palmer, Nicholette D;Pankratz, Nathan;Papanicolaou, George J;Peralta, Juan M;Peyser, Patricia A;Rich, Stephen S;Rotter, Jerome I;Silverman, Edwin K;Smith, Jennifer A;Smith, Nicholas L;Taylor, Kent D;Thornton, Timothy A;Tiwari, Hemant K;Tracy, Russell P;Wang, Tao;Weiss, Scott T;Weng, Lu-Chen;Wiggins, Kerri L;Wilson, James G;Yanek, Lisa R;Zöllner, Sebastian;North, Kari E;Auer, Paul L;, ;, ;Raffield, Laura M;Reiner, Alexander P;Li, Yun;
Vol. 15 , No. 12 , pp. e1008500
365 views DOI Abstract
2016
Differentiation between MAMP Triggered Defenses in Arabidopsis thaliana
Vetter M.
Vol. 12 , pp. 0-0
350 views DOI
2006
Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings.
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. e41-
348 views Abstract
2016
Exonic Splicing Mutations Are More Prevalent than Currently Estimated and Can Be Predicted by Using In Silico Tools.
Soukarieh, Omar;Gaildrat, Pascaline;Hamieh, Mohamad;Drouet, Aurélie;Baert-Desurmont, Stéphanie;Frébourg, Thierry;Tosi, Mario;Martins, Alexandra;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. e1005756-
340 views Abstract
2019
A region-based gene association study combined with a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis identifies SMG1 as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene.
Wong, Cavin;Chen, Fei;Alirezaie, Najmeh;Wang, Yifan;Cuggia, Adeline;Borgida, Ayelet;Holter, Spring;Lenko, Tatiana;Domecq, Celine;, ;Petersen, Gloria M;Syngal, Sapna;Brand, Randall;Rustgi, Anil K;Cote, Michele L;Stoffel, Elena;Olson, Sara H;Roberts, Nicholas J;Akbari, Mohammad R;Majewski, Jacek;Klein, Alison P;Greenwood, Celia M T;Gallinger, Steven;Zogopoulos, George;
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1008344
327 views DOI Abstract
View All 68 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.