Indexed in Journament

PLoS genetics

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,442 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
68 Articles
Scores higher than 84.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name PLoS Genet
Abbreviated Name plos genetics
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 38.9
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 70.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for PLoS genetics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 38.9 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 5.0 5.8
Content Distribution 70.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (68)

2019
Performing different kinds of physical exercise differentially attenuates the genetic effects on obesity measures: Evidence from 18,424 Taiwan Biobank participants.
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1008277
514 views DOI Abstract
2014
Deep evolutionary comparison of gene expression identifies parallel recruitment of trans-factors in two independent origins of C4 photosynthesis.
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. e1004365-
463 views Abstract
2019
Increased vulnerability of nigral dopamine neurons after expansion of their axonal arborization size through D2 dopamine receptor conditional knockout.
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1008352
450 views DOI Abstract
2016
Phosphatidylserine Ameliorates Neurodegenerative Symptoms and Enhances Axonal Transport in a Mouse Model of Familial Dysautonomia.
Vol. 12 , No. 12 , pp. e1006486
442 views DOI Abstract
2017
The creation and selection of mutations resistant to a gene drive over multiple generations in the malaria mosquito.
Vol. 13 , No. 10 , pp. e1007039-
416 views Abstract
2019
Use of >100,000 NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium whole genome sequences improves imputation quality and detection of rare variant associations in admixed African and Hispanic/Latino populations.
Vol. 15 , No. 12 , pp. e1008500
414 views DOI Abstract
2016
Exonic Splicing Mutations Are More Prevalent than Currently Estimated and Can Be Predicted by Using In Silico Tools.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. e1005756-
377 views Abstract
2019
A region-based gene association study combined with a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis identifies SMG1 as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene.
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1008344
374 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tryptamine accumulation caused by deletion of MrMao-1 in Metarhizium genome significantly enhances insecticidal virulence.
Vol. 16 , No. 4 , pp. e1008675-
35 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quantitative analysis questions the role of MeCP2 as a global regulator of alternative splicing.
Vol. 16 , No. 10 , pp. e1009087
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
selection and subsequent physiological characterization of industrial saccharomyces cerevisiae strains during continuous growth at sub- and- supra optimal temperatures
Vol. 26 , pp. e00462-
182 views Abstract
2019
enhancing the detection of toxoplasma gondii via an anti-sag1 scfv-alkaline phosphatase immunoconjugate
Vol. 23 , pp. -
237 views Abstract
2019
Manipulating mtDNA in vivo reprograms metabolism via novel response mechanisms.
Vol. 15 , No. 10 , pp. e1008410
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of >100,000 NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Consortium whole genome sequences improves imputation quality and detection of rare variant associations in admixed African and Hispanic/Latino populations.
Vol. 15 , No. 12 , pp. e1008500
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Crossover interference and sex-specific genetic maps shape identical by descent sharing in close relatives.
Vol. 15 , No. 12 , pp. e1007979
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
A region-based gene association study combined with a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis identifies SMG1 as a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene.
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1008344
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Performing different kinds of physical exercise differentially attenuates the genetic effects on obesity measures: Evidence from 18,424 Taiwan Biobank participants.
Vol. 15 , No. 8 , pp. e1008277
514 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,442 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.