canadian journal of philosophy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4539 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

canadian journal of philosophy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim ahci
Short Name canadian journal of philosophy
Abbreviated Name canadian journal of philosophy
ISSN 0045-5091
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.canadianjournalofphilosophy.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

2017
empowerment as replacement for the three laws of robotics
;Christoph Salge;Christoph Salge;Daniel Polani
Vol. 4 , pp. -
343 views DOI Abstract
2016
quality diversity: a new frontier for evolutionary computation
;Justin K Pugh;Lisa B. Soros;Kenneth O. Stanley
Vol. 3 , pp. -
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neoliberalism versus distributional autonomy: the skipped step in rawls’s the law of peoples
Edmundson, W.
Vol. 49 , pp. 169-181
321 views DOI
2016
grammars for games: a gradient-based framework for optimization in deep learning
;David eBalduzzi
Vol. 2 , pp. -
305 views DOI Abstract
2016
self-organization in multi-agent systems based on examples of modeling economic relationships between agents
;Rafal Krolikowski;Michal Kopys;Wojciech Jedruch;Wojciech Jedruch
Vol. 3 , pp. -
293 views DOI Abstract
2018
multi-modal detection and mapping of static and dynamic obstacles in agriculture for process evaluation
;Timo Korthals;Mikkel Kragh;Peter Christiansen;Henrik Karstoft;Rasmus N. Jørgensen;Ulrich Rückert
Vol. 5 , pp. -
287 views DOI Abstract
2017
narratives with robots: the impact of interaction context and individual differences on story recall and emotional understanding
;Iolanda Leite;Marissa McCoy;Monika Lohani;Daniel Ullman;Nicole Salomons;Charlene Stokes;Susan Rivers;Brian Scassellati
Vol. 4 , pp. -
281 views DOI Abstract
2014
the past, present, and future of artificial life
;Wendy eAguilar;Guillermo eSantamaría Bonfil;Tom eFroese;Carlos eGershenson
Vol. 1 , pp. -
273 views DOI Abstract
2014
how to build an embodiment lab: achieving body representation illusions in virtual reality
;Bernhard eSpanlang;Jean-Marie eNormand;Jean-Marie eNormand;David eBorland;David eBorland;David eBorland;Konstantina eKilteni;Elias eGiannopoulos;Ausias ePomes;Mar eGonzalez-Franco;Daniel ePérez Marcos;Jorge eArroyo Palacios;Xavier Navarro Muncunill;Mel eSlater
Vol. 1 , pp. -
271 views DOI Abstract
2013
Conversational implicature, communicative intentions, and content
Buchanan, R.
Vol. 43 , pp. 720-740
250 views DOI
View All 32 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.