Indexed in Journament

canadian journal of philosophy

ISSN 0045-5091· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1/100
Journament Score
#9,874
Journament Rank
32
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name canadian journal of philosophy
Abbreviated Name canadian journal of philosophy
ISSN 0045-5091
URL http://www.canadianjournalofphilosophy.com

Indexings

scopus ulakbim ahci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2016
quality diversity: a new frontier for evolutionary computation
;Justin K Pugh;Lisa B. Soros;Kenneth O. Stanley
Vol. 3 , pp. -
435 views DOI Abstract
2017
empowerment as replacement for the three laws of robotics
;Christoph Salge;Christoph Salge;Daniel Polani
Vol. 4 , pp. -
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neoliberalism versus distributional autonomy: the skipped step in rawls’s the law of peoples
Edmundson, W.
Vol. 49 , pp. 169-181
331 views DOI
2016
grammars for games: a gradient-based framework for optimization in deep learning
;David eBalduzzi
Vol. 2 , pp. -
325 views DOI Abstract
2018
multi-modal detection and mapping of static and dynamic obstacles in agriculture for process evaluation
;Timo Korthals;Mikkel Kragh;Peter Christiansen;Henrik Karstoft;Rasmus N. Jørgensen;Ulrich Rückert
Vol. 5 , pp. -
317 views DOI Abstract
2016
self-organization in multi-agent systems based on examples of modeling economic relationships between agents
;Rafal Krolikowski;Michal Kopys;Wojciech Jedruch;Wojciech Jedruch
Vol. 3 , pp. -
308 views DOI Abstract
2017
narratives with robots: the impact of interaction context and individual differences on story recall and emotional understanding
;Iolanda Leite;Marissa McCoy;Monika Lohani;Daniel Ullman;Nicole Salomons;Charlene Stokes;Susan Rivers;Brian Scassellati
Vol. 4 , pp. -
306 views DOI Abstract
2014
the past, present, and future of artificial life
;Wendy eAguilar;Guillermo eSantamaría Bonfil;Tom eFroese;Carlos eGershenson
Vol. 1 , pp. -
296 views DOI Abstract
2014
how to build an embodiment lab: achieving body representation illusions in virtual reality
;Bernhard eSpanlang;Jean-Marie eNormand;Jean-Marie eNormand;David eBorland;David eBorland;David eBorland;Konstantina eKilteni;Elias eGiannopoulos;Ausias ePomes;Mar eGonzalez-Franco;Daniel ePérez Marcos;Jorge eArroyo Palacios;Xavier Navarro Muncunill;Mel eSlater
Vol. 1 , pp. -
287 views DOI Abstract
2013
Conversational implicature, communicative intentions, and content
Buchanan, R.
Vol. 43 , pp. 720-740
261 views DOI
2019
automatic off-line design of robot swarms: a manifesto
;Mauro Birattari;Antoine Ligot;Darko Bozhinoski;Manuele Brambilla;Gianpiero Francesca;Lorenzo Garattoni;David Garzón Ramos;Ken Hasselmann;Miquel Kegeleirs;Jonas Kuckling;Federico Pagnozzi;Andrea Roli;Muhammad Salman;Thomas Stützle
Vol. 6 , pp. -
121 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neoliberalism versus distributional autonomy: the skipped step in rawls’s the law of peoples
Edmundson, W.
Vol. 49 , pp. 169-181
331 views DOI
2018
simulation-based internal models for safer robots
;Christian Blum;Alan F. T. Winfield;Verena V. Hafner
Vol. 4 , pp. -
224 views DOI Abstract
2018
markerless eye-hand kinematic calibration on the icub humanoid robot
;Pedro Vicente;Lorenzo Jamone;Lorenzo Jamone;Alexandre Bernardino
Vol. 5 , pp. -
86 views DOI Abstract
2018
modeling uncertainty for the double standard model using a fuzzy inference system
;Noelia Torres;Leonardo Trujillo;Yazmin Maldonado
Vol. 5 , pp. -
239 views DOI Abstract
2018
multi-modal detection and mapping of static and dynamic obstacles in agriculture for process evaluation
;Timo Korthals;Mikkel Kragh;Peter Christiansen;Henrik Karstoft;Rasmus N. Jørgensen;Ulrich Rückert
Vol. 5 , pp. -
317 views DOI Abstract
2018
resisting influence: how the strength of predispositions to resist control can change strategies for optimal opinion control in the voter model
;Markus Brede;Markus Brede;Valerio Restocchi;Valerio Restocchi;Sebastian Stein
Vol. 5 , pp. -
107 views DOI Abstract
2018
constructive preference elicitation
;Paolo Dragone;Paolo Dragone;Stefano Teso;Andrea Passerini
Vol. 4 , pp. -
105 views DOI Abstract
2018
rationale, implementation and evaluation of assistive strategies for an active back-support exoskeleton
;Stefano Toxiri;Stefano Toxiri;Axel S. Koopman;Maria Lazzaroni;Maria Lazzaroni;Jesús Ortiz;Valerie Power;Michiel P. de Looze;Michiel P. de Looze;Leonard O'Sullivan;Leonard O'Sullivan;Darwin G. Caldwell
Vol. 5 , pp. -
260 views DOI Abstract
2017
empowerment as replacement for the three laws of robotics
;Christoph Salge;Christoph Salge;Daniel Polani
Vol. 4 , pp. -
371 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.