european journal of political theory | Journament

Journal Ranking

#487 / 33,934
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
45
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ 4 أيام

european journal of political theory

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
الاسم المختصر european journal of political theory
الاسم المختصر european journal of political theory
ISSN 1474-8851
الهدف والنطاق
The European Journal of Political Theory provides a high profile research forum. Broad in scope and international in readership, the Journal is named after its geographical location, but is committed to advancing original debates in political theory in the widest possible sense--geographical, historical, and ideological. The Journal publishes contributions in analytic political philosophy, political theory, comparative political thought, and the history of ideas of any tradition. Work that challenges orthodoxies and disrupts entrenched debates is particularly encouraged. All research articles are subject to triple-blind peer-review by internationally renowned scholars in order to ensure the highest standards of quality and impartiality.
URL https://journals.sagepub.com/home/EPT
تعليمات المؤلفين https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/EPT
Added by Said Nadeem on Aug 01, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2019
Ontology and political theory: A critical encounter between Rawls and Foucault
Rosenthal, I.
Vol. 18 , pp. 238-258
269 views DOI
2014
history and structure of the constitution of cooperative enterprise. political changes of a social relationship
;Devi Sacchetto;Marco Semenzin
Vol. 26 , No. 50 , pp. -
210 views DOI Abstract
2017
utopia as politics of emancipation: miguel abensour, jacques rancière and the legacies of utopian socialism
;Federico Tomasello
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
189 views DOI Abstract
2017
bible and women starting from the reformation: 500 years of changes. facoltà valdese di teologia roma, 5-6 maggio 2017
;Eleonora Cappuccilli
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
175 views DOI
2011
vísperas del leviatán. instituciones y poder politico (portugal, siglo xvii)
;Antonio Manuel Hespanha
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. -
163 views DOI
2015
foucault: a heretic?
;Judith Revel
Vol. 27 , No. 52 , pp. -
159 views DOI Abstract
2016
rationalism and traditionalism in politics. the correspondence between karl r. popper and michael oakeshott
;Spartaco Pupo
Vol. 28 , No. 54 , pp. -
158 views DOI Abstract
2006
colonialismo, modernità, autodeterminazione. il concetto di nazione in josé carlos mariátegui
;Maura Brighenti
Vol. 18 , No. 35 , pp. -
149 views DOI
2017
between hobbes and spinoza. research on the philosophical matrix of ferdinand tönnies’ sociological categories
;Furio Ferraresi
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
137 views DOI Abstract
2010
musei e secessioni come spazi di comunicazione politica: monaco - berlino - vienna (1840-1910)
;Monica Cioli
Vol. 22 , No. 43 , pp. -
128 views DOI
View All 50 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
45
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.