Indexed in Journament

european journal of political theory

ISSN 1474-8851· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
16.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #29,278 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
50 Articles
Scores higher than 0.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

The European Journal of Political Theory provides a high profile research forum. Broad in scope and international in readership, the Journal is named after its geographical location, but is committed to advancing original debates in political theory in the widest possible sense--geographical, historical, and ideological. The Journal publishes contributions in analytic political philosophy, political theory, comparative political thought, and the history of ideas of any tradition. Work that challenges orthodoxies and disrupts entrenched debates is particularly encouraged. All research articles are subject to triple-blind peer-review by internationally renowned scholars in order to ensure the highest standards of quality and impartiality.
Short Name european journal of political theory
Abbreviated Name european journal of political theory
ISSN 1474-8851
URL https://journals.sagepub.com/home/EPT
Author Instructions https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/EPT

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility 30.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 11.1 28.8
Innovation 10.5 31.2
Community Impact 2.1 13.4
Content Distribution 25.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (50)

2019
Ontology and political theory: A critical encounter between Rawls and Foucault
Rosenthal, I.
Vol. 18 , pp. 238-258
302 views DOI
2014
history and structure of the constitution of cooperative enterprise. political changes of a social relationship
;Devi Sacchetto;Marco Semenzin
Vol. 26 , No. 50 , pp. -
249 views DOI Abstract
2017
utopia as politics of emancipation: miguel abensour, jacques rancière and the legacies of utopian socialism
;Federico Tomasello
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
218 views DOI Abstract
2017
bible and women starting from the reformation: 500 years of changes. facoltà valdese di teologia roma, 5-6 maggio 2017
;Eleonora Cappuccilli
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
215 views DOI
2015
foucault: a heretic?
;Judith Revel
Vol. 27 , No. 52 , pp. -
210 views DOI Abstract
2016
rationalism and traditionalism in politics. the correspondence between karl r. popper and michael oakeshott
;Spartaco Pupo
Vol. 28 , No. 54 , pp. -
186 views DOI Abstract
2011
vísperas del leviatán. instituciones y poder politico (portugal, siglo xvii)
;Antonio Manuel Hespanha
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. -
180 views DOI
2006
colonialismo, modernità, autodeterminazione. il concetto di nazione in josé carlos mariátegui
;Maura Brighenti
Vol. 18 , No. 35 , pp. -
179 views DOI
2017
between hobbes and spinoza. research on the philosophical matrix of ferdinand tönnies’ sociological categories
;Furio Ferraresi
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
158 views DOI Abstract
2010
musei e secessioni come spazi di comunicazione politica: monaco - berlino - vienna (1840-1910)
;Monica Cioli
Vol. 22 , No. 43 , pp. -
156 views DOI
2019
Civil disobedience, and what else? Making space for uncivil forms of resistance
Pineda, E.
, pp. 0-0
124 views DOI
2019
Ontology and political theory: A critical encounter between Rawls and Foucault
Rosenthal, I.
Vol. 18 , pp. 238-258
302 views DOI
2018
fragmentary genealogies. tendencies and linearities of history in friedrich schlegel
;Giulia Valpione
Vol. 30 , No. 58 , pp. -
17 views DOI Abstract
2017
schmitt’s theory of großraum: a post-statal perspective?
;Antonino Scalone
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
83 views DOI Abstract
2017
bible and women starting from the reformation: 500 years of changes. facoltà valdese di teologia roma, 5-6 maggio 2017
;Eleonora Cappuccilli
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
215 views DOI
2017
between hobbes and spinoza. research on the philosophical matrix of ferdinand tönnies’ sociological categories
;Furio Ferraresi
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
158 views DOI Abstract
2017
utopia as politics of emancipation: miguel abensour, jacques rancière and the legacies of utopian socialism
;Federico Tomasello
Vol. 29 , No. 56 , pp. -
218 views DOI Abstract
2016
rationalism and traditionalism in politics. the correspondence between karl r. popper and michael oakeshott
;Spartaco Pupo
Vol. 28 , No. 54 , pp. -
186 views DOI Abstract
2016
una questione politica: l'epoca urbana che sta venendo reporting from the front (28 maggio – 27 novembre 2016, biennale di architettura, venezia) contested cities (4-7 luglio 2016, madrid) shaping cities (14-15 luglio 2016, venezia) habitat iii (12-20 ottobre 2016, quito)
;Niccolò Cuppini
Vol. 28 , No. 55 , pp. -
100 views DOI
2015
transizioni globali nella città. tra nuove cittadinanze e spazi di democrazia
;Anna Lazzarini
Vol. 27 , No. 53 , pp. -
9 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
16.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #29,278 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

16.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

10.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

25.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.