rationalism and traditionalism in politics. the correspondence between karl r. popper and michael oakeshott

Clicks: 141
ID: 230219
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The correspondence of 1948 between Karl Popper and Michael Oakeshott, translated for the first time in Italian and published in the appendix to this paper, demonstrates the existence of two different ways of thinking about politics: the rationalist approach, founded on the “argumentation” as a rational means for the non-violent solution of problems (Popper), and the traditionalist mode, inspired by the method of “conversation” as a guarantee of constant openness to the diversity of identities (Oakeshott). To rise from the letters is a mutual influence on the interpretation of the key concepts that characterize the thought of the two authors, which however does not cancel the fundamental divergence of their political orientation.
Reference Key
pupo2016scienzarationalism Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Spartaco Pupo
Journal european journal of political theory
Year 2016
DOI
10.6092/issn.1825-9618/6199
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.