neurochemistry international | Journament

Journal Ranking

#123 / 33,718
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
30
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

neurochemistry international

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name neurochem int
Abbreviated Name neurochem int
ISSN 1872-9754
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (43 total)

2017
Adjuvant quercetin therapy for combined treatment of epilepsy and comorbid depression.
Singh, Tanveer;Kaur, Taranjot;Goel, Rajesh Kumar;
Vol. 104 , pp. 27-33
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Alzheimer's disease-like pathology-triggered oxidative stress, alterations in monoamines levels, and structural damage of locus coeruleus neurons are partially recovered by a mix of proteoglycans of embryonic genesis
Aghajanov, M.
Vol. 131 , pp. 0-0
306 views DOI
2017
Adjuvant quercetin therapy for combined treatment of epilepsy and comorbid depression.
Singh, Tanveer;Kaur, Taranjot;Goel, Rajesh Kumar;
Vol. 104 , pp. 27-33
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antioxidant cascades confer neuroprotection in ethanol, morphine, and methamphetamine preconditioning.
Lu, Shuang;Liao, Lvshuang;Zhang, Bing;Yan, Weitao;Chen, Liangpei;Yan, He;Guo, Limin;Lu, Shanshan;Xiong, Kun;Yan, Jie;
, pp. 104540
273 views DOI
2006
la prigione e la libertà: due testimonianze del dialogo di fortini con i classici
;Pietro Cataldi
, No. 14 , pp. 89-94
259 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intranasal wnt-3a alleviates neuronal apoptosis in early brain injury post subarachnoid hemorrhage via the regulation of wnt target PPAN mediated by the moonlighting role of aldolase C.
Ruan, Wu;Hu, Junwen;Zhou, Hang;Li, Yin;Xu, Chaoran;Luo, Yujie;Chen, Ting;Xu, Bangliang;Yan, Feng;Chen, Gao;
, pp. 104656
251 views DOI Abstract
2019
Activation of MORs in the VTA induces changes on cFos expression in different projecting regions: Effect of inflammatory pain
Campos-Jurado, Y.
Vol. 131 , pp. 0-0
243 views DOI
2020
Chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve in rats causes different activation modes of microglia between the anterior and posterior horns of the spinal cord
Nishihara, T.
Vol. 134 , pp. 0-0
222 views DOI
2015
a cortesia em pedidos em italiano: um estudo comparativo da percepção de brasileiros e italianos
;Mayara da Silva Neto;Elisabetta Santoro
, No. 30 , pp. 80-110
214 views DOI Abstract
2011
sulla cortesia linguistica: un’analisi sociopragmatica di un’intervista tra fabio fazio e antonio di pietro
;Edoardo Natale
, No. 21-22 , pp. 65-80
205 views DOI Abstract
View All 43 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
30
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.