Indexed in Journament

neuroscience research

ISSN 1872-8111· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,162 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
64 Articles
Scores higher than 38.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name neurosci res
Abbreviated Name neurosci res
ISSN 1872-8111
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/neuroscience-research

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 69.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for neuroscience research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 2.9 13.4
Content Distribution 69.5 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (64)

2017
mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of miocene pelitic sedimentary rocks from the south-western part of the pannonian basin system (croatia): implications for provenance studies
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 65-80
318 views DOI Abstract
2017
a comparative analysis among computational intelligence techniques for dissolved oxygen prediction in delaware river
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 517-527
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) impairs working memory and alters patterns of dopamine signaling in mesocorticolimbic substrates.
294 views DOI Abstract
2011
effects of hydrocarbon generation on fluid flow in the ordos basin and its relationship to uranium mineralization
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 439-447
293 views DOI Abstract
2020
metallogenesis and ore-forming time of the changtuxili mn–ag–pb–zn deposit in inner mongolia: evidence from c–o–s isotopes and u–pb geochronology
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 1369-1380
291 views Abstract
2012
petrogenetic evolution of the felsic and mafic volcanic suite in the siang window of eastern himalaya, northeast india
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 613-634
280 views DOI Abstract
2014
how many sutures in the southern central asian orogenic belt: insights from east xinjiang–west gansu (nw china)?
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 525-536
278 views DOI Abstract
2017
schreibersite on the early earth: scenarios for prebiotic phosphorylation
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 329-335
265 views DOI Abstract
2016
state-of-the-art review of some artificial intelligence applications in pile foundations
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 33-44
253 views DOI Abstract
2012
fossil charcoal from the middle jurassic of the ordos basin, china and its paleoatmospheric implications
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 493-502
251 views DOI Abstract
2020
metallogenesis and ore-forming time of the changtuxili mn–ag–pb–zn deposit in inner mongolia: evidence from c–o–s isotopes and u–pb geochronology
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 1369-1380
291 views Abstract
2020
a synthesis of iron deposits in the eastern tianshan, nw china
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 1271-1287
16 views Abstract
2019
Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) impairs working memory and alters patterns of dopamine signaling in mesocorticolimbic substrates.
294 views DOI Abstract
2018
pennsylvanian glacimarine sedimentation in the cushamen formation, western north patagonian massif
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 485-504
245 views DOI Abstract
2018
a relational database of global u–pb ages
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 877-891
15 views Abstract
2018
petrogenesis of siliceous high-mg series: evidence from early paleoproterozoic mafic volcanic rocks of the vodlozero domain, fennoscandian shield
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 207-221
194 views DOI Abstract
2018
paleoarchean bedrock lithologies across the makhonjwa mountains of south africa and swaziland linked to geochemical, magnetic and tectonic data reveal early plate tectonic genes flanking subduction margins
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 603-665
204 views Abstract
2018
zircon u–pb–hf isotopic and geochemical characteristics of the xierzi biotite monzogranite pluton, linxi, inner mongolia and its tectonic implications
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 505-516
190 views DOI Abstract
2018
3-d crustal-scale gravity model of the san rafael block and payenia volcanic province in mendoza, argentina
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 239-248
128 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,162 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.