neuroscience research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1303 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

neuroscience research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name neurosci res
Abbreviated Name neurosci res
ISSN 1872-8111
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/neuroscience-research
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (64 total)

2019
Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) impairs working memory and alters patterns of dopamine signaling in mesocorticolimbic substrates.
Bernstein, David L;Nayak, Sunyl U;Oliver, Chicora F;Rawls, Scott M;Rom, Slava;
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
a comparative analysis among computational intelligence techniques for dissolved oxygen prediction in delaware river
;Ehsan Olyaie;Hamid Zare Abyaneh;Ali Danandeh Mehr
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 517-527
254 views DOI Abstract
2011
effects of hydrocarbon generation on fluid flow in the ordos basin and its relationship to uranium mineralization
;Chunji Xue;Guoxiang Chi;Wei Xue
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 439-447
246 views DOI Abstract
2017
mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of miocene pelitic sedimentary rocks from the south-western part of the pannonian basin system (croatia): implications for provenance studies
;Anita Grizelj;Zoran Peh;Darko Tibljaš;Marijan Kovačić;Tomislav Kurečić
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 65-80
244 views DOI Abstract
2012
petrogenetic evolution of the felsic and mafic volcanic suite in the siang window of eastern himalaya, northeast india
;A. Krishnakanta Singh;R.K. Bikramaditya Singh
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 613-634
241 views DOI Abstract
2020
metallogenesis and ore-forming time of the changtuxili mn–ag–pb–zn deposit in inner mongolia: evidence from c–o–s isotopes and u–pb geochronology
;Kuo Zhang;Ruo-Shi Jin;Feng-Yue Sun;Bi-Le Li;Peng He;Yue-Long Zhang;Shuo Guo;Tian-Fu Zhang
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 1369-1380
240 views Abstract
2014
how many sutures in the southern central asian orogenic belt: insights from east xinjiang–west gansu (nw china)?
;Wenjiao Xiao;Chunming Han;Wei Liu;Bo Wan;Ji'en Zhang;Songjian Ao;Zhiyong Zhang;Dongfang Song;Zhonghua Tian;Jun Luo
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 525-536
230 views DOI Abstract
2017
schreibersite on the early earth: scenarios for prebiotic phosphorylation
;Matthew A. Pasek
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 329-335
220 views DOI Abstract
2018
pennsylvanian glacimarine sedimentation in the cushamen formation, western north patagonian massif
;Paulo Marcos;Daniel A. Gregori;Leonardo Benedini;Mercedes Barros;Leonardo Strazzere;Cecilia Pavón Pivetta
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 485-504
209 views DOI Abstract
2014
flood basalt hosted palaeosols: potential palaeoclimatic indicators of global climate change
;M.R.G. Sayyed
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 791-799
208 views DOI Abstract
View All 64 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.