Indexed in Journament

journal of neurotrauma

ISSN 1557-9042· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,334 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 44.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j neurotrauma
Abbreviated Name j neurotrauma
ISSN 1557-9042
URL http://www.liebertpub.com/overview/journal-of-neurotrauma/39

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of neurotrauma
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 80.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2017
optimization of cement-based grouts using chemical additives
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 623-637
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Post-Traumatic Epilepsy and Seizure Susceptibility in Rat Models of Penetrating and Closed-Head Brain Injury.
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury during Adolescence Enhances Cocaine Rewarding Efficacy and Dysregulates Dopamine and Neuroimmune Systems in Brain Reward Substrates.
411 views DOI Abstract
2016
prediction of rock brittleness using nondestructive methods for hard rock tunneling
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 533-540
393 views DOI Abstract
2015
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Parameters in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Correlation with Early Neuropsychological Impairment: A Longitudinal Study.
Vol. 32 , No. 19 , pp. 1497-509
392 views DOI Abstract
2014
theoretical and numerical studies of crack initiation and propagation in rock masses under freezing pressure and far-field stress
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 466-476
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Functional brain hyper-activations are linked to an electrophysiological measure of slow inter-hemispheric transfer time after pediatric moderate/severe traumatic brain injury.
357 views DOI Abstract
2014
swelling characteristics of gaomiaozi bentonite and its prediction
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 113-118
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modulation of post-traumatic immune response using the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra for improved visual outcomes.
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modulation of post-traumatic immune response using the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra for improved visual outcomes.
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Post-Traumatic Epilepsy and Seizure Susceptibility in Rat Models of Penetrating and Closed-Head Brain Injury.
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Functional brain hyper-activations are linked to an electrophysiological measure of slow inter-hemispheric transfer time after pediatric moderate/severe traumatic brain injury.
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury during Adolescence Enhances Cocaine Rewarding Efficacy and Dysregulates Dopamine and Neuroimmune Systems in Brain Reward Substrates.
411 views DOI Abstract
2018
correlating mode-i fracture toughness and mechanical properties of heat-treated crystalline rocks
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 91-101
286 views DOI Abstract
2018
geomechanical characterization of volcanic rocks using empirical systems and data mining techniques
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 138-150
236 views DOI Abstract
2017
explicit reinforcement models for fully-grouted rebar rock bolts
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 267-280
215 views DOI Abstract
2017
fracture toughness estimation of ballast stone used in iranian railway
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 892-899
285 views DOI Abstract
2017
determination of safe mud window considering time-dependent variations of temperature and pore pressure: analytical and numerical approaches
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 900-911
209 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,334 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

80.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.