Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2346 / 33,947
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Europace
Abbreviated Name europace
ISSN 1532-2092
Aim and Scope
URL http://europace.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2019
Very late arrhythmia recurrences in patients with sinus rhythm within the first year after catheter ablation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.
Kornej, Jelena;Schumacher, Katja;Sommer, Philipp;Potpara, Tatjana;Arya, Arash;Dagres, Nikolaos;Bollmann, Andreas;Husser-Bollmann, Daniela;Lip, Gregory Y H;Hindricks, Gerhard;
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute ischaemic stroke: design and baseline data of the prospective multicentre Berlin Atrial Fibrillation Registry.
Haeusler, Karl Georg;Tütüncü, Serdar;Kunze, Claudia;Schurig, Johannes;Malsch, Carolin;Harder, Janek;Wiedmann, Silke;Dimitrijeski, Boris;Ebinger, Martin;Hagemann, Georg;Hamilton, Frank;Honermann, Martin;Jungehulsing, Gerhard Jan;Kauert, Andreas;Koennecke, Hans-Christian;Leithner, Christoph;Mackert, Bruno-Marcel;Masuhr, Florian;Nabavi, Darius;Rocco, Andrea;Schmehl, Ingo;Schmitz, Bettina;Sparenberg, Paul;Stingele, Robert;von Brevern, Michael;Völzke, Enrico;Dietzel, Joanna;Heuschmann, Peter U;Endres, Matthias;
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
The electrocardiogram endeavour: from the Holter single-lead recordings to multilead wearable devices supported by computational machine learning algorithms.
Vardas, Panos;Cowie, Martin;Dagres, Nikolaos;Asvestas, Dimitrios;Tzeis, Stylianos;Vardas, Emmanuel P;Hindricks, Gerhard;Camm, John;
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Artificial intelligence capable of detecting left ventricular hypertrophy: pushing the limits of the electrocardiogram?
Kashou, Anthony H;Noseworthy, Peter A;
304 views DOI
2020
Self-reported treatment burden in patients with atrial fibrillation: quantification, major determinants, and implications for integrated holistic management of the arrhythmia.
Potpara, Tatjana S;Mihajlovic, Miroslav;Zec, Nevena;Marinkovic, Milan;Kovacevic, Vladan;Simic, Jelena;Kocijancic, Aleksandar;Vajagic, Leona;Jotic, Aleksandra;Mujovic, Nebojsa;Stankovic, Goran R;
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Peri-left bundle branch pacing in a patient with right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and atrioventricular infra-Hisian block
Wu, S.
Vol. 21 , pp. 1038
279 views DOI
2020
Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and risk of fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mongkhon, Pajaree;Fanning, Laura;Wong, Kirstie H T W;Man, Kenneth K C;Wong, Ian C K;Lau, Wallis C Y;
278 views DOI Abstract
2019
Electrocardiographic characterization of non-selective His-bundle pacing: validation of novel diagnostic criteria.
Jastrzębski, Marek;Moskal, Paweł;Curila, Karol;Fijorek, Kamil;Kukla, Piotr;Bednarek, Agnieszka;Kiełbasa, Grzegorz;Bednarski, Adam;Baranchuk, Adrian;Czarnecka, Danuta;
275 views DOI Abstract
2020
Safety of smartwatches and their chargers in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Tzeis, Stylianos;Asvestas, Dimitrios;Moraitis, Nektarios;Vardas, Emmanuel P;Mililis, Panagiotis;Letsas, Konstantinos;Kouvelas, Konstantinos;Nikita, Konstantina S;Vardas, Panos;
249 views DOI Abstract
2016
sadhana naithani, folklore theory in postwar germany, university press of mississippi, jackson, 2014, 142 p.
;Ioana Repciuc
, No. 4 , pp. -
200 views DOI
View All 28 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.