Indexed in Journament

journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the american society for bone and mineral research

ISSN 1523-4681· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,046 of 29,312 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
122 Articles
Scores higher than 82.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j bone miner res
Abbreviated Name j bone miner res
ISSN 1523-4681

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the american society for bone and mineral research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 15.0 19.1
Timeliness 100.0 9.2
Diversity 30.0 25.9
Innovation 40.0 27.4
Community Impact 37.0 7.8
Content Distribution 10.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (122)

2019
A CTGF-RUNX2-RANKL Axis in Breast and Prostate Cancer cells Promotes Tumor Progression in Bone.
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are associated with reduced fracture risk among older Veterans with dementia.
301 views DOI Abstract
2020
Depression and Bone Mineral Density.
288 views DOI
2020
Reply to Depression and Bone Mineral Density.
240 views DOI
2012
Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: A 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee
80 views DOI Abstract
2012
The gut microbiota regulates bone mass in mice
74 views DOI Abstract
2014
The Recent Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Low Bone Mass in the United States Based on Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck or Lumbar Spine
58 views DOI Abstract
2014
Trabecular Bone Score: A Noninvasive Analytical Method Based Upon the DXA Image
57 views DOI Abstract
2013
Atypical Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures: Second Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
48 views DOI Abstract
2014
Diagnosis and Management of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and International Consensus
47 views DOI Abstract
2026
Circadian regulators PER1 and PER2 control osteoclastogenesis in male mice through coordinated regulation of opposing innate immunity genes
DOI Abstract
2026
2026
Lesion Expansion in Craniofacial Fibrous Dysplasia: Natural History and Indicators of Progression in the Frontal, Zygomatic, and Sphenoid Bones
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Genotype-First Characterization of Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia Type 1: Prevalence, Serum Calcium and Clinical Associations
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Identification of a novel small-molecule modulator targeting SNX10 to inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Osteosarcopenia Revisited: From Mechanisms to Management
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Fracture Risk Prediction in Patients Receiving Dialysis
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
Large scale proteomic analyses of HR-pQCT-derived bone loss at the radius and tibia in older men
15 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,046 of 29,312 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

10.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.