Indexed in Journament

Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir

ISSN 1308-4488· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,745 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
49 Articles
Scores higher than 8.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars
Abbreviated Name turk kardiyol dern ars
ISSN 1308-4488
URL http://www.archivestsc.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 60.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.0 13.4
Content Distribution 61.0 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (49)

2019
[Snapshot evaluation of heart failure in Turkey: Baseline characteristics of SELFIE-TR].
Vol. 47 , No. 3 , pp. 198-206
398 views DOI Abstract
2017
Recovery of cardiomyopathy induced by ventricular premature beats of paraHisian origin after successful radiofrequency catheter ablation.
Vol. 45 , No. 8 , pp. 744-747
378 views DOI Abstract
2017
preparation of a modified electrode for the determination of levofloxacin
Vol. 18 , No. 5 , pp. 962-972
356 views DOI Abstract
2016
2018
multiple criteria decision making approach for industrial engineer selection using fuzzy ahp-fuzzy topsis
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 58-82
323 views DOI Abstract
2017
optical vibrational and morphological properties of s-co3o4 nanostructured thin film
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 388-397
311 views DOI Abstract
2018
Assessment of cardiac autonomic functions by heart rate variability in patients with restless leg syndrome.
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 191-196
308 views DOI Abstract
2015
[Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society].
Vol. 43 Suppl 1 , pp. 1-14
280 views
2017
[Atrial fibrillation in the elderly].
Vol. 45 , No. Suppl 5 , pp. 75-82
276 views DOI Abstract
2020
A free-floating tumor-like mass in the left atrium: A huge pedunculated thrombus.
Vol. 48 , No. 3 , pp. 329
60 views DOI
2019
[Snapshot evaluation of heart failure in Turkey: Baseline characteristics of SELFIE-TR].
Vol. 47 , No. 3 , pp. 198-206
398 views DOI Abstract
2018
multiple criteria decision making approach for industrial engineer selection using fuzzy ahp-fuzzy topsis
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 58-82
323 views DOI Abstract
2018
Assessment of cardiac autonomic functions by heart rate variability in patients with restless leg syndrome.
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 191-196
308 views DOI Abstract
2018
[Authors reply].
Vol. 46 , No. 5 , pp. 427
78 views
2017
analysis of gold micro-beams with modified strain gradient theory
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 663-681
177 views DOI Abstract
2017
frequency independent self complementary bow tie antenna design for gpr applications
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 131-138
95 views DOI Abstract
2017
alternative methods to preserve sweet red pepper paste quality: effect of temperature and protective agents
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 695-704
224 views DOI Abstract
2017
preparation of a modified electrode for the determination of levofloxacin
Vol. 18 , No. 5 , pp. 962-972
356 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,745 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

60.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.