2016 national conference on electrical, electronics and biomedical engineering, eleco 2016 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3744 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 minggu yang lalu

2016 national conference on electrical, electronics and biomedical engineering, eleco 2016

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Pengindeksan
scopus
Nama Singkat 2016 national conference on electrical, electronics and biomedical engineering, eleco 2016
Nama Singkatan 2016 national conference on electrical, electronics and biomedical engineering, eleco 2016
ISSN
Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup
URL
Petunjuk untuk Penulis

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2015
a prospective observational survey on the long-term effect of ldl apheresis on drug-resistant nephrotic syndrome
;Eri Muso;Masatoshi Mune;Tsutomu Hirano;Motoshi Hattori;Kenjiro Kimura;Tsuyoshi Watanabe;Hitoshi Yokoyama;Hiroshi Sato;Shunya Uchida;Takashi Wada;Tetsuo Shoji;Tsukasa Takemura;Yukio Yuzawa;Satoru Ogahara;Satoshi Sugiyama;Yasuhiko Iino;Soichi Sakai;Yousuke Ogura;Susumu Yukawa;Yoshiki Nishizawa;Noriaki Yorioka;Enyu Imai;Seiichi Matsuo;Takao Saito
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 58-66
483 views DOI Abstract
2011
crescentic glomerulonephritis in iga multiple myeloma: a case report
;Grace T. Moscoso-Solorzano;Marcus V. Madureira-Silva;Carlos Balda;Marcello F. Franco;Gianna Mastroianni-Kirsztajn
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 69-72
438 views DOI Abstract
2017
changes in cerebral oxygenation associated with intradialytic blood transfusion in patients with severe anemia undergoing hemodialysis
;Kiyonori Ito;Susumu Ookawara;Yuichiro Ueda;Haruhisa Miyazawa;Masaya Kofuji;Hideyuki Hayasaka;Takayuki Uchida;Katsunori Yanai;Hiroki Ishii;Mitsutoshi Shindo;Taisuke Kitano;Keiji Hirai;Yoshio Kaku;Taro Hoshino;Kaoru Tabei;Yoshiyuki Morishita
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 42-51
398 views DOI Abstract
2017
Network coded cooperation in delay tolerant networks
Calik, O.
, pp. 627-631
370 views
2013
renoprotection and the bardoxolone methyl story - is this the right way forward a novel view of renoprotection in ckd trials: a new classification scheme for renoprotective agents
;Macaulay Onuigbo
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 36-49
339 views DOI Abstract
2016
new insight into atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients: overexpression of scavenger receptor and macrophage colony-stimulating factor genes
;Miki Nishida;Minoru Ando;Yusuke Iwamoto;Ken Tsuchiya;Kosaku Nitta
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 22-30
294 views DOI Abstract
2014
renin-angiotensin system inhibitors reduce serum asymmetric dimethylarginine levels and oxidative stress in normotensive patients with chronic kidney disease
;Hideki Fujii;Keiji Kono;Kentaro Nakai;Shunsuke Goto;Riko Kitazawa;Masafumi Fukagawa;Shinichi Nishi
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 18-25
294 views DOI Abstract
2017
Performance analysis of fuzzy logic controllers having Mamdani and Takagi-Sugeno inference methods by using unique software and toolbox
Unsal, S.
, pp. 237-241
191 views
2014
urinary alpha- and pi-glutathione s-transferases in adult patients with type 1 diabetes
;Bernt Johan von Scholten;Simone Theilade;Maria Lajer;Peter Rossing
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 127-133
189 views DOI Abstract
2017
Feedback and feedforward control in DC/DC boost converter
Bilhan, A.
, pp. 387-391
178 views
View All 12 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.