Tuberkuloz ve toraks | Journament

Journal Ranking

#802 / 33,930
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

Tuberkuloz ve toraks

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name Tuberk Toraks
Abbreviated Name tuberk toraks
ISSN 0494-1373
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2009
[Hemoptysis in a case with partial pulmonary artery agenesis and diagnostic delay].
Gülhan, Meral;Simşek Utku, Ezgi;Akpinar, Eylem;Korkmaz, Sule;Bilgiç, Sadik;
Vol. 57 , No. 2 , pp. 223-7
341 views Abstract
2016
replicon rna viral vectors as vaccines
;Kenneth Lundstrom
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 39-
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pathological features of COVID-19 infection from biopsy and autopsy series
Çopur S;Kanbay A;Afşar B;Elsürer Afşar R;Kanbay M;;
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. -
306 views Abstract
2020
[Management of obstructive sleep apnea during COVID-19 pandemic]
Gülbay B;Azap A;Kaya A;Acıcan T;;
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. -
300 views Abstract
2020
Asthma and COVID-19: What do we know?
Sarıoğlu N;;
Vol. 68 , No. 2 , pp. -
290 views Abstract
2013
kaiser permanente vaccine study center: highlights of 2009–2012
;Nicola P. Klein;Roger Baxter
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 139-153
288 views DOI Abstract
2016
immunological evaluation of recent muc1 glycopeptide cancer vaccines
;Md Kamal Hossain;Katherine A. Wall
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 25-
269 views DOI Abstract
2004
The comparison of the result of exercise bronchoprovocation test and methacholine bronchoprovocation test in athletes
Dal, U.
Vol. 52 , pp. 315-322
254 views
2013
sustaining vaccine confidence in the 21st century
;Karin Hardt;Ruprecht Schmidt-Ott;Steffen Glismann;Richard A. Adegbola;François P. Meurice
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 204-224
247 views DOI Abstract
2014
vaccine adjuvants in fish vaccines make a difference: comparing three adjuvants (montanide isa763a oil, cpg/poly i:c combo and vhsv glycoprotein) alone or in combination formulated with an inactivated whole salmonid alphavirus antigen
;Hanna L. Thim;Stéphane Villoing;Marian McLoughlin;Karen Elina Christie;Søren Grove;Petter Frost;Jorunn B. Jørgensen
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 228-251
235 views DOI Abstract
View All 33 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.