turkish journal of public health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2978 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

turkish journal of public health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name turkish journal of public health
Abbreviated Name turkish journal of public health
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2011
Pandemic (H1N1) influenza in Diyarbakir, 2009
Ertem, Meliksah;Sevencan, Funda;Dorman, Vedat;Ozcullu, Neval;Ormanli, Vahit;Kubat, Namik Kemal;Albayrak, Nurhan;Altas, Basak;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 86-95
583 views Abstract
2016
the factor analysis of problems of rural waste management in qazvin township
;Parvaneh Safari Alamouti;Ali Shams
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 6-6
313 views DOI Abstract
2017
investigation of traditional rangeland-based husbandry system in the baladeh-nour, mazandaran province
;Iman Haghiyan;Golam Ali Heshmati;hossein Barani;jamshid Ghorbani;Godrat Heydari
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 497-508
300 views DOI Abstract
2016
analysis of the factors affecting the export of food industry products: rural development approaches
;Azam Nejatianpour;Abdolkarim Esmaeili
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 335-353
258 views DOI Abstract
2015
determining the constraints and challenges of vermicompost technology development: the case of active sites in kermanshah province
;mariyeh sahraie;Kiumars Zarafshani
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 319-336
255 views DOI Abstract
2011
Bazı aile hekimliği pilot uygulama birimlerinde birinci basamak değerlendirme ölçeği (BDÖ) (Primary Care Assessment Survey) ile sağlık hizmet özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi
Lağarlı, Tülay;Eser, Erhan;Akdeniz, Mustafa;Aydoğdu, Bahar;Baklaya, Ümit;Fıra, Canan;Saatçioğlu, Adnan;Sönmez, Burak;Taner, Eylül;Tığlı, Seval;Topçu, Koray;Yıldız, Başak;Yılmaz, Nurcan;Yorgun, Hülya;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 16-32
254 views Abstract
2015
analysis of factors influencing the attitude of rural households of shadegan wetland on agrobiodiversity
;Roghayeh Yousefi Hajivand;Mansour ghanian;masoud baradaran;leila Ramezani
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 109-126
250 views DOI Abstract
2017
a study of individual and family barriers to women's political and social participation: evidence from shirez district in harsin city
;Hossaein Agahi;Akram Binaian;Saber Fatahi
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 21-39
248 views DOI Abstract
2015
feasibility of implementing "low-crop planting" in order to restore jazmoryan wetland; case study: jiroft county
;Hamed Eskandari Damaneh;Hossein Noroozi;Hassan Khosravi;Hamed Rafiee;Emran Taheri Rykande
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 287-298
213 views DOI Abstract
2011
Genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalar: Sağlığa zararlarını kanıtlamak neden zor? Sorunlar ve riskin ipuçları
Ergin, Işıl;Karababa, Ali Osman;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 113-122
198 views Abstract
View All 30 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.