Indexed in Journament

turkish journal of public health

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,617 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
94 Articles
Scores higher than 74% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name turkish journal of public health
Abbreviated Name turkish journal of public health
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 100.0
Innovation 31.5
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 14.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.3
Accessibility — 18.3
Timeliness 100.0 12.6
Diversity — 27.3
Innovation 31.5 28.9
Community Impact 9.3 9.7
Content Distribution 14.0 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (94)

2011
Pandemic (H1N1) influenza in Diyarbakir, 2009
Ertem, Meliksah;Sevencan, Funda;Dorman, Vedat;Ozcullu, Neval;Ormanli, Vahit;Kubat, Namik Kemal;Albayrak, Nurhan;Altas, Basak;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 86-95
618 views Abstract
2016
the factor analysis of problems of rural waste management in qazvin township
;Parvaneh Safari Alamouti;Ali Shams
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 6-6
359 views DOI Abstract
2017
investigation of traditional rangeland-based husbandry system in the baladeh-nour, mazandaran province
;Iman Haghiyan;Golam Ali Heshmati;hossein Barani;jamshid Ghorbani;Godrat Heydari
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 497-508
346 views DOI Abstract
2015
determining the constraints and challenges of vermicompost technology development: the case of active sites in kermanshah province
;mariyeh sahraie;Kiumars Zarafshani
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 319-336
321 views DOI Abstract
2016
analysis of the factors affecting the export of food industry products: rural development approaches
;Azam Nejatianpour;Abdolkarim Esmaeili
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 335-353
300 views DOI Abstract
2011
Bazı aile hekimliği pilot uygulama birimlerinde birinci basamak değerlendirme ölçeği (BDÖ) (Primary Care Assessment Survey) ile sağlık hizmet özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi
Lağarlı, Tülay;Eser, Erhan;Akdeniz, Mustafa;Aydoğdu, Bahar;Baklaya, Ümit;Fıra, Canan;Saatçioğlu, Adnan;Sönmez, Burak;Taner, Eylül;Tığlı, Seval;Topçu, Koray;Yıldız, Başak;Yılmaz, Nurcan;Yorgun, Hülya;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 16-32
297 views Abstract
2015
analysis of factors influencing the attitude of rural households of shadegan wetland on agrobiodiversity
;Roghayeh Yousefi Hajivand;Mansour ghanian;masoud baradaran;leila Ramezani
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 109-126
296 views DOI Abstract
2017
a study of individual and family barriers to women's political and social participation: evidence from shirez district in harsin city
;Hossaein Agahi;Akram Binaian;Saber Fatahi
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 21-39
287 views DOI Abstract
2015
feasibility of implementing "low-crop planting" in order to restore jazmoryan wetland; case study: jiroft county
;Hamed Eskandari Damaneh;Hossein Noroozi;Hassan Khosravi;Hamed Rafiee;Emran Taheri Rykande
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 287-298
266 views DOI Abstract
2011
Genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalar: Sağlığa zararlarını kanıtlamak neden zor? Sorunlar ve riskin ipuçları
Ergin, Işıl;Karababa, Ali Osman;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 113-122
231 views Abstract
2026
Correction to: A cross-sectional study on national cancer screening participation among people with physical disabilities: focus on health screening experience and perceptions
DOI
2026
United Kingdom pandemic preparedness: lessons from hantavirus and Ebola for public health readiness
Sam Ghebrehewet, Ting Shi
10 views DOI
2026
Examining the effectiveness of a nationwide place-based policy approach to improving physical activity participation: a controlled interrupted time series analysis
Andrew Brinkley, Paul Freeman
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Social inequalities in the risk of student burnout
Mareike Rußmann, Nicolai Netz, Karsten Becker, Marie-Christin Lenz
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mental health literacy and gender differences in psychotherapy utilisation among university students: a cross-sectional study
Celina Karger, Rainer Weber, Timo‐Kolja Pförtner
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Interventions to increase breast cancer screening attendance among immigrants: a cross-sectional international survey
Sameer Shaikh, Marie Vigdis Heimseter, Gunhild Mangerud, Eli Eikefjord, Hanna Dyrstad Hartvigsen, Livia Giordano, Veli‐Matti Partanen, Marthe Larsen, Silje Sagstad, Ana Natale‐Pereira, Arlinda Ruco, Kelly Bunzeluk, Anne Mette Fløe Hvass, Solveig Hofvind
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Digital behavior and communication competence in nursing students: nomophobia and phubbing
Vasfiye Bayram Değer, Songül Ayduran
10 views DOI
2026
Case identification of drug and alcohol presentations in the emergency department using triage narratives: a systematic review
Kar Lin Su, Christopher Picard, Sejal R. Singh, Carmel Montgomery
10 views DOI
2026
Community-based approaches to childhood and adolescent healthy weight promotion: a realist inspired review
Else Ladekjær, Nina Kamstrup-Larsen, Anne Timm, Jane Nautrup Østergaard, Anders Blædel Gottlieb Hansen, Mette Fogh, Marie Ørts Rahbæk, Tine Buch‐Andersen, Heidi Klakk Egebæk
12 views DOI
2026
Development and application of a framework for classifying stakeholder roles in co-creation research: a Health CASCADE study
Katrina Messiha, Mai J. M. Chinapaw, Johannes C. F. Ket, Renée I. Wink, Teatske M. Altenburg
14 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,617 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

31.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

14.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.