Conversational AI chatbots in smoking cessation: a systematic review of behaviour change mechanisms and user experiences

Clicks: 3
ID: 338878
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #155 of 157 articles by views in turkish journal of public health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 157 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Aim To synthesise evidence on experiences of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot-supported smoking cessation interventions and evaluate the extent to which behaviour change theory is integrated into their design and implementation. Subject and methods A systematic review was conducted of studies published between 2016 and 2026 that examined AI chatbot-supported smoking cessation interventions. Eligible studies explored behaviour change processes and reported outcomes related to user experience, engagement, continuance intention, or smoking reduction. Study identification, screening, quality appraisal, and synthesis were undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines to ensure methodological transparency and rigour. Results The systematic review found that perceived anonymity, accessibility, usefulness, and quality of interaction were key factors shaping users’ experiences and ongoing engagement with chatbot interventions. Personalised support, timely feedback, and conversational communication were associated with greater user satisfaction and stronger cessation outcomes. Behaviour change techniques were embedded within some interventions; however, the application of behaviour change theories was often inconsistent and insufficiently reported. The evidence also highlighted the need for greater attention to diverse socio-economic and geographical contexts, given the influence of digital health literacy on intervention uptake and effectiveness. Conclusion AI chatbot interventions show promise as accessible and acceptable tools for supporting smoking cessation. Positive user experiences were associated with sustained engagement and more favourable cessation outcomes. However, stronger theoretical integration, more consistent evaluation approaches, and greater consideration of socio-economic and geographical diversity are needed to strengthen the evidence base and support the development of effective, user-centred digital cessation interventions.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225333056 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal turkish journal of public health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1007/s10389-026-02926-6
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.