Indexed in Journament

adli tıp bülteni

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.7/100
Journament Score
#9,268
Journament Rank
36
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name adli tıp bülteni
Abbreviated Name adli tıp bülteni
ISSN 0000-0000

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (36)

2011
Adli Toksikolojinin Duayen İsmi Prof Dr Hayri Sözen
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. -
617 views Abstract
2009
twitter as a public space, or how we’re re-forming the new spaces for cultural journalism
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 89-103
365 views Abstract
2008
Akıl Hastalarında Önyargılar Nedeniyle Tanısı Geçirebilen Veya Atlanabilen Hastalıklar İki Olgu Sunumu
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. -
352 views Abstract
2009
Kocaeli Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Adli Tıp Anabilim Daltna Başvuran Çocuklara Yönelik Cinsel İstismar Olguları 1998-2006
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. -
351 views Abstract
2015
twitter as an information source of unexpected events: following hashtags in the case #ardevalencia
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 27-51
337 views DOI Abstract
2017
risk and disasters on internet’s journalism: the case of mexico
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 10-19
326 views DOI Abstract
2012
citizenship and public university: university social responsibility ideas
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 46-62
325 views Abstract
2015
2008
Matruşka Göç İstismar Eğitim Eksikliği Negatif Ailesel Faktörler ve Çocuk Suçluluğu
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. -
301 views Abstract
2009
rethinking over textuality of digital image: a methodological proposal for pleasant reading on digital screens
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 62-88
288 views Abstract
2018
Suça Sürüklenen Çocukların Klinik ve Sosyodemografik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. -
142 views Abstract
2017
risk and disasters on internet’s journalism: the case of mexico
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 10-19
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
Potansiyel Yaralama Etkileri Açısından Havai Fişekler
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. -
23 views Abstract
2016
a broad, diverse and international look at the history of communication research
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 184-187
201 views DOI Abstract
2015
producción informativa en salud: periodismo radiofónico en puebla
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 125-145
185 views DOI Abstract
2015
twitter as an information source of unexpected events: following hashtags in the case #ardevalencia
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 27-51
337 views DOI Abstract
2015
influence of communicative habits in generating participation and political cynicism among the pre-citizens
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 37-59
253 views DOI Abstract
2015
2014
editorial
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 1-4
188 views
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.