pamukkale university journal of engineering sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2449 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

pamukkale university journal of engineering sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name pamukkale university journal of engineering sciences
Abbreviated Name pamukkale university journal of engineering sciences
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (96 total)

2017
trif differentially regulates hepatic steatosis and inflammation/fibrosis in micesummary
;Ling Yang;Kouichi Miura;Bi Zhang;Hiroshi Matsushita;Yoon Mee Yang;Shuang Liang;Jingyi Song;Yoon Seok Roh;Ekihiro Seki
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 469-483
415 views Abstract
2016
the rna polymerase iii subunit polr3b is required for the maintenance of small intestinal crypts in micesummary
;Julia E. Kieckhaefer;Sabina Lukovac;Diana Z. Ye;Dolim Lee;Danielle J. Beetler;Michael Pack;Klaus H. Kaestner
Vol. 2 , No. 6 , pp. 783-795
391 views Abstract
2016
Artımlı sac şekillendirme tekniği ile otomobil sac parça üretimi
DURGUN, İsmail ;SAKİN, Ali ;
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 8-16
367 views Abstract
2016
Proteince Zenginleştirilmiş İzmir Gevreğinin Kuruma Davranışının İncelenmesi
Turkut, Gülsüm Merve ;Çakmak, Hülya ;Tavman, Şebnem ;
Vol. 21 , No. 9 , pp. 421-427
357 views Abstract
2016
reduction of p53 by knockdown of the ugt1 locus in colon epithelial cells causes an increase in tumorigenesissummary
;Miao Liu;Shujuan Chen;Mei-Fei Yueh;Guangji Wang;Haiping Hao;Robert H. Tukey
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 63-76.e5
340 views Abstract
2013
Köyyollarının Takibi, Bakım Ve Onarımı İçin Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemi (CBS) Esaslı Yönetim Modeli: Denizli Örneği
Murat, Yetiş Şazi ;Saldıroğlu, Selim ;
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 240-248
336 views Abstract
2006
MODELING OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROUNDWATER FLOW AND OTHER METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES USING FUZZY LOGIC
YURTÇU, Şaban ;UYGUNOĞLU, Tayfun ;İÇAĞA, Yılmaz ;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 285-292
334 views Abstract
2017
İçme suyu şebeke arızalarına müdahale için karar destek sisteminin geliştirilmesi
BETTEMİR, Önder Halis ;ÖZDEMİR, Özgür ;FIRAT, Mahmut ;
Vol. 23 , No. 9 , pp. 1049-1054
300 views Abstract
1999
ÇOKKATLI YAPILAR İÇİN DÜŞEY-DOĞRUSAL PROJE PLANLAMASI
ÖZDEMİR, İlker ;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 1093-1098
299 views Abstract
2005
ÖĞRENCİ YURDU KATI ATIKLARININ GERİ KAZANIMININ EKONOMİK AÇIDAN ARAŞTIRILMASI
KOÇER, Nilüfer (NACAR) ;IŞIK, Hilal (ARSLANOĞLU) ;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 373-380
290 views Abstract
View All 96 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.