pain research & management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1833 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

pain research & management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name pain res manag
Abbreviated Name pain res manag
ISSN 1918-1523
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.pulsus.com/journals/journalHome.jsp?sCurrPg=journal&jnlKy=7&fold=Home
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2019
Effect of Moxibustion on HIF-1 and VEGF Levels in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Gong, Yuanyuan;Yu, Zeyun;Wang, Yingni;Xiong, Yan;Zhou, Yumei;Liao, Chen-Xi;Li, Yuan;Luo, Yun;Bai, Yu;Chen, Bailu;Tang, Yuzhi;Wu, Ping;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 4705247
364 views DOI Abstract
2010
survey of thermophilic campylobacter species in cats and dogs in north-western nigeria
;Adewale Kolawale;Junaidu U. Abdulkadir;Abdullahi A. Magaji;Mohammed D. Salihu
Vol. 46 , No. 4 , pp. 425-430
330 views Abstract
2008
engineering and design of vehicles for long distance road transport of livestock: the example of cattle transport in northern australia
;John W. Lapworth
Vol. 44 , No. 1 , pp. 215-222
321 views Abstract
2010
antibody levels against rabies among occupationally exposed individuals in a nigerian university
;Babasola O. Olugasa;Adebayo O. Odeniyi;Aina O. Adeogun;Oluwagbenga A. Adeola
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 21-28
317 views Abstract
2009
the global livestock impact mapping system (glims) as a tool for animal health applications
;Gianluca Franceschini;Timothy P. Robinson;Karl Morteo;Dario Dentale;William Wint;Joachim Otte
Vol. 45 , No. 4 , pp. 491-499
305 views Abstract
2010
prevalence of thermotolerant campylobacter in broiler flocks and broiler carcasses in italy
;Giacomo Migliorati;Giorgio Iannitto;Ugo Santucci;Margherita Pisanu;Antonella Costa;Anna Cerrone;Carla Grattarola;Silvia Tagliabue;Monica Staffolani;Lisa Barco;Alessandra Alessiani;Patrizia Colangeli;Vincenza Prencipe;Elisabetta Di Giannatale
Vol. 46 , No. 4 , pp. 415-423
297 views Abstract
2011
characterisation of staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from food for human consumption
;Elisabetta Di Giannatale;Vincenza Prencipe;Alfreda Tonelli;Cristina Marfoglia;Giacomo Migliorati
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 165-173
293 views Abstract
2010
beta-lactamase escherichia coli and staphylococcus aureus isolated from chickens in nigeria
;Godwin Onyemaechi Egwu;Sunday Akidarju Mamza;Gideon Dauda Mshelia
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 155-165
289 views Abstract
2010
emerging diseases and implications for millennium development goals in africa by 2015 - an overview
;Mohammed Bello;Tagang Aluwong
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 137-145
289 views Abstract
2019
Effects of Mobilization Time on Occurrence of New Fractures after Vertebroplasty.
Akpolat, Ahmet Onur;Karaca, Sinan;
Vol. 2019 , pp. 9292617
269 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.