clinical imaging | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4199 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

clinical imaging

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name clin imaging
Abbreviated Name clin imaging
ISSN 1873-4499
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/clinical-imaging
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

Predictors for basal ganglia viability after mechanical thrombectomy in proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Kaschner, Marius Georg;Lande, Raul;Rubbert, Christian;Caspers, Julian;Lee, John-Ih;Gliem, Michael;Jander, Sebastian;Turowski, Bernd;
Vol. 57 , pp. 1-6
363 views DOI Abstract
2020
Biomechanical properties of optic nerve and retrobulbar structures with 2D and 3D shear wave elastography in patients affected by glaucoma.
Guazzaroni, Manlio;Ferrari, Donatella;Lamacchia, Feliciana;Salimei, Fabio;Marsico, Salvatore;Citraro, Daniele;Campagnuolo, Tanio;Girardi, Valentina;Orlacchio, Antonio;
Vol. 61 , pp. 106-114
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neuroimaging depression and anxiety in essential tremor: A diffusion tensor imaging study.
Sengul, Yildizhan;Otcu, Hafize;Ustun, Ismet;Sengul, Hakan S;Cersonsky, Tess;Alkan, Alpay;Louis, Elan D;
Vol. 58 , pp. 96-104
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bringing radiology to patient's home using mobile equipment: A weapon to fight COVID-19 pandemic.
Zanardo, Moreno;Schiaffino, Simone;Sardanelli, Francesco;
Vol. 68 , pp. 99-101
324 views DOI Abstract
2018
MRI of prolapsed polypoid adenomyoma: Expanding the differential diagnosis for the broccoli sign
Patel N.
Vol. 52 , pp. 177-179
315 views DOI
2019
Measurement of the depth of facial nerve at the level of stylomastoid foramen using MR imaging in Bell's palsy.
Karaca, Harun;Soydan, Levent;Yildiz, Selçuk;Toros, Sema Zer;
Vol. 58 , pp. 34-38
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimizing patient experience scores in outpatient breast centers.
Gerlach, Karen E;Phalak, Kanchan;Parikh, Jay R;
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. 141-145
288 views DOI Abstract
Computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage of splenic abscesses.
Taşar, Mustafa;Uğurel, Mehmet Sahin;Kocaoğlu, Murat;Sağlam, Mutlu;Somuncu, Ibrahim;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 44-8
279 views Abstract
2020
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: Review of guidelines for resuming non-urgent imaging and procedures in radiology during Phase II.
Azam, Saif A;Myers, Lee;Fields, Brandon K K;Demirjian, Natalie L;Patel, Dakshesh;Roberge, Eric;Gholamrezanezhad, Ali;Reddy, Sravanthi;
Vol. 67 , pp. 30-36
277 views DOI Abstract
2020
Asymptomatic novel coronavirus pneumonia patient outside Wuhan: The value of CT images in the course of the disease
Lin, C.
Vol. 63 , pp. 7-9
268 views DOI
View All 29 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.