Indexed in Journament

comparative biochemistry and physiology b, comparative biochemistry

ISSN 0305-0491· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,459 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 13.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

The journal publishes original articles emphasizing comparative and environmental aspects of the physiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, toxicology and endocrinology of animals. Adaptation and evolution as organizing principles are encouraged. Studies on other organisms will be considered if approached in a comparative context. Part A. Molecular and Integrative Physiology covers molecular, cellular, integrative, and ecological physiology. Topics include bioenergetics, circulation, development, excretion, ion regulation, endocrinology, neurobiology, nutrition, respiration, and thermal biology. Studies on regulatory mechanisms at any level or organization such as signal transduction and cellular interactions and control of behaviour are encouraged. Part B. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology covers biochemical and molecular biological aspects of metabolism, enzymology, regulation, nutrition, signal transduction, promoters, gene structure and regulation, metabolite and cell constituents, macromolecular structures, adaptational mechanisms and evolutionary principles. Part C. Toxicology and Pharmacology covers chemical and drug action at different levels of organization, biotransformation of xenobiotics, mechanisms of toxicity, including reactive oxygen species and carcinogenesis, endocrine disruptors, natural products chemistry, and signal transduction. A molecular approach to these fields is encouraged. Measured rather than nominal exposure concentrations of toxicants must be reported whenever possible. For water-borne exposures of aquatic organisms, reporting of detailed chemistry data for the exposure waters is encouraged. When reporting data obtained from bioassays (e.g., LC50 tests), raw data (i.e., the value of the measured biological response variable(s) for each treatment and each observation time) should be submitted as online supplementary material. Part D. Genomics and Proteomics covers the broader comprehensive approaches to comparative biochemistry and physiology that can be generally termed as "-omics", e.g., genomics, functional genomics (transcriptomics), proteomics, metabolomics, and underlying bioinformatics. Papers dealing with fundamental aspects and hypotheses in comparative physiology and biochemistry are encouraged rather than studies whose main focus is purely technical of methodological. Naturally, a certain degree of overlap exists between the different sections, and the final decision as to where a particular manuscript will be published after passing the rigorous review process lies with the editorial office.
Short Name comp biochem physiol, b
Abbreviated Name comp biochem physiol, b
ISSN 0305-0491
URL https://www.elsevier.com/locate/cbpb
Author Instructions https://www.elsevier.com/journals/comparative-biochemistry-and-physiology-part-b-biochemistry-and-molecular-biology/1096-4959/guide-for-authors

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 15.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 74.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for comparative biochemistry and physiology b, comparative biochemistry
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 15.0 27.4
Community Impact 4.3 7.8
Content Distribution 74.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2002
2017
technical clearance for mental disorders among the servers in the city hall of manaus: a preliminary analysis
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 13-24
288 views DOI Abstract
1976
2010
core stability training methods <br> métodos de treinamento da estabilização central
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 93-101
234 views Abstract
2017
technical clearance for mental disorders among the servers in the city hall of manaus: a preliminary analysis
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 13-24
288 views DOI Abstract
2016
educational booklet on diabetes construction and content validation
Vol. 37 , No. 1 , pp. 77-82
155 views DOI Abstract
2015
evaluation of noise in a neonatal unit at a university hospital
Vol. 36 , No. 1Supl , pp. 189-198
112 views DOI Abstract
2015
cereal bar with added chayote peel flour: physico-chemical and sensory characteristics among children
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 85-96
150 views DOI Abstract
2011
absenteeism at a medium size philanthropic hospital <br> absenteísmo em hospital filantrópico de médio porte
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 03-14
201 views Abstract
2010
core stability training methods <br> métodos de treinamento da estabilização central
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 93-101
234 views Abstract
2008
xanthan gum:characteristics and operational conditions of production <br> goma xantana: características e condições operacionais de produção
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 171-188
175 views Abstract
Journament Score
27.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,459 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.