Indexed in Journament

International Journal of Clinical Practice

ISSN 1368-5031· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,162 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 48.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name International Journal of Clinical Practice
Abbreviated Name int j clin pract
ISSN 1368-5031

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 16.7
Innovation 58.5
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 69.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 16.7 22.7
Innovation 58.5 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.2
Content Distribution 69.5 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2008
Effects of oxybutynin transdermal system on health-related quality of life and safety in men with overactive bladder and prostate conditions.
Staskin, D R;Rosenberg, M T;Dahl, N V;Polishuk, P V;Zinner, N R;
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. 27-38
384 views Abstract
2015
Should patients prescribed long-term low-dose aspirin receive proton pump inhibitors? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tran-Duy, A;Vanmolkot, F H;Joore, M A;Hoes, A W;Stehouwer, C D A;
Vol. 69 , No. 10 , pp. 1088-111
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and validation of a Score to Assess Risk of Medication Errors detected during medication reconciliation process at admission in Internal Medicine Unit: SCOREM study
Audurier Y;Roubille C;Manna F;Zerkowski L;Faucanie M;Macioce V;Castet-Nicolas A;Jalabert A;Villiet M;Fesler P;Lohan-Descamps L;Breuker C;;
, pp. -
310 views Abstract
2005
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss following intracarotid injection of heroin
Kortequee, S.;Agada, F. O.;Coatesworth, A. P.;
Vol. 59 , pp. 128-129
308 views DOI
2018
Efficacy and safety of a triple active sore throat lozenge in the treatment of patients with acute pharyngitis: Results of a multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial (DoriPha)
Palm, J.
Vol. 72 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2021
Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and multiparametric MRI in detecting index tumours in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Coşar, Uğur;Şen, İlker;Aydos, Uğuray;Koparal, Murat Yavuz;Uçar, Murat;Tokgöz, Nil;Gönül, İpek Işık;Akdemir, Ümit Özgür;Atay, Lütfiye Özlem;Sözen, Tevfik Sinan;
, pp. e14287
289 views DOI Abstract
2021
The effect of risk factors on surgical and oncological results in high-risk prostate cancer: A multicentre study of the urooncology society, Turkey.
İzol, Volkan;Akdoğan, Nebil;Özen, Haluk;Akdoğan, Bülent;Kural, Ali Rıza;Tuna, Mustafa Bilal;Sözen, Sinan;Türkeri, Levent;Tansuğ, Mustafa Zühtü;, ;
, pp. e14281
256 views DOI Abstract
2010
Counterfeit dapoxetine sold on the Internet contains undisclosed sildenafil: Letter
Dean, J.
Vol. 64 , pp. 1319-1322
251 views DOI
2021
Factors affecting long-term renal functions after partial vs radical nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: A Multicentre Study of the Urooncology Association, Turkey.
Izol, Volkan;Gokalp, Fatih;Sozen, Sinan;Ozden, Ender;Bayazit, Yildirim;Muezzinoglu, Talha;Kara, Onder;Cetin, Serhat;Gulsen, Murat;Turkeri, Levent;Zuhtu Tansug, Mustafa;, ;
Vol. 75 , No. 5 , pp. e13960
246 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influenza vaccine: A viable option to protect pregnant women and infants from seasonal flu: A retrospective hospital-based study in India
Singh, M.
Vol. 73 , pp. 0-0
243 views DOI
2021
Double and triple burden of non-communicable diseases and its determinants among adults in Bangladesh: Evidence from a recent demographic and health survey.
Al-Zubayer, Md Akib;Ahammed, Benojir;Sarder, Md Alamgir;Kundu, Subarna;Majumder, Uttam Kumar;Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful;
Vol. 75 , No. 10 , pp. e14613
62 views DOI Abstract
2021
Role of NLR, PLR, ELR and CLR in differentiating COVID-19 patients with and without pneumonia.
Damar Çakırca, Tuba;Torun, Ayşe;Çakırca, Gökhan;Portakal, Reyhan Derya;
Vol. 75 , No. 11 , pp. e14781
125 views DOI Abstract
2021
Factors affecting long-term renal functions after partial vs radical nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: A Multicentre Study of the Urooncology Association, Turkey.
Izol, Volkan;Gokalp, Fatih;Sozen, Sinan;Ozden, Ender;Bayazit, Yildirim;Muezzinoglu, Talha;Kara, Onder;Cetin, Serhat;Gulsen, Murat;Turkeri, Levent;Zuhtu Tansug, Mustafa;, ;
Vol. 75 , No. 5 , pp. e13960
246 views DOI Abstract
2021
The effect of risk factors on surgical and oncological results in high-risk prostate cancer: A multicentre study of the urooncology society, Turkey.
İzol, Volkan;Akdoğan, Nebil;Özen, Haluk;Akdoğan, Bülent;Kural, Ali Rıza;Tuna, Mustafa Bilal;Sözen, Sinan;Türkeri, Levent;Tansuğ, Mustafa Zühtü;, ;
, pp. e14281
256 views DOI Abstract
2021
Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and multiparametric MRI in detecting index tumours in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Coşar, Uğur;Şen, İlker;Aydos, Uğuray;Koparal, Murat Yavuz;Uçar, Murat;Tokgöz, Nil;Gönül, İpek Işık;Akdemir, Ümit Özgür;Atay, Lütfiye Özlem;Sözen, Tevfik Sinan;
, pp. e14287
289 views DOI Abstract
2021
How accurate is radiological imaging for perirenal fat and renal vein invasion in renal cell carcinoma?
Ucer, Oktay;Muezzinoglu, Talha;Ozden, Ender;Aslan, Guven;Izol, Volkan;Bayazit, Yildirim;Altan, Mesut;Akdogan, Bulent;Ozen, Haluk;Sozen, Sinan;Cetin, Serhat;Suer, Evren;Esen, Baris;Baltaci, Sumer;, ;
, pp. e14359
187 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and validation of a Score to Assess Risk of Medication Errors detected during medication reconciliation process at admission in Internal Medicine Unit: SCOREM study
Audurier Y;Roubille C;Manna F;Zerkowski L;Faucanie M;Macioce V;Castet-Nicolas A;Jalabert A;Villiet M;Fesler P;Lohan-Descamps L;Breuker C;;
, pp. -
310 views Abstract
2019
Influenza vaccine: A viable option to protect pregnant women and infants from seasonal flu: A retrospective hospital-based study in India
Singh, M.
Vol. 73 , pp. 0-0
243 views DOI
2018
Efficacy and safety of a triple active sore throat lozenge in the treatment of patients with acute pharyngitis: Results of a multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial (DoriPha)
Palm, J.
Vol. 72 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2015
Should patients prescribed long-term low-dose aspirin receive proton pump inhibitors? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tran-Duy, A;Vanmolkot, F H;Joore, M A;Hoes, A W;Stehouwer, C D A;
Vol. 69 , No. 10 , pp. 1088-111
350 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,162 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

16.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

58.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.