proceeding - 2018 international seminar on intelligent technology and its application, isitia 2018 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#841 / 33,930
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

proceeding - 2018 international seminar on intelligent technology and its application, isitia 2018

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proceeding - 2018 international seminar on intelligent technology and its application, isitia 2018
Abbreviated Name proceeding - 2018 international seminar on intelligent technology and its application, isitia 2018
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2002
inulin and oligofructosis: a review about functional properties, prebiotic effects and importance for food industry
;Maria Celia de Oliveira Hauly;Janaína Andréa Moscatto
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 99-112
314 views Abstract
2014
synthesis and characterization of a novel meso-porphyrin and its metallo derivatives
;Paulo Cesar Bega;Jacqueline Aparecida Marques
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 171-184
269 views DOI Abstract
2019
Indonesian Question Generation Based on Bloom's Taxonomy Using Text Analysis
Kusuma, S.
, pp. 269-274
263 views DOI
2010
a theoretical study of 1,4-bis (3-carboxy-3-oxo-prop-1-enyl) benzene i
;Marcello Ferreira da Costa
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 31-36
254 views Abstract
2013
chemical composition and fatty acids quantification in commercial meat products processed in brazil
;Fabio Machry Sanches;Paula Fernandes Montanher;Carlos Eduardo Silva;Lucia Felicidade Dias;Fabio Augusto Garcia Coró;Nilson Evelazio de Souza
Vol. 34 , No. 1 , pp. 97-106
228 views DOI Abstract
2009
chemical characterization of clay srm by x-ray fluorescence – results comparison from different laboratories
;Carlos Roberto Appoloni;Paulo Sérgio Parreira;Mônica Rueda;Susana Martínez Stagnaro;Fábio Lopes;Fábio Luiz Melquiades
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 145-150
207 views Abstract
2003
reflectivity in bragg mirrors of algaassb/alassb on inp
;Jean C. Harmand;Bernard Nabet;Edson Laureto;Luiz Carlos Poças;José Leonil Duarte;Sidney Alves Lourenço;Ivan Frederico Lupiano Dias;Dari de Oliveira Toginho Filho
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 69-84
206 views Abstract
2001
vapour and air bubble collapse analysis in viscous compressible water
;Gil Bazanini
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 13-18
188 views Abstract
2003
robust control applied induction machine employed of matlab/ simulink
;José Paulo Fernandes Garcia;Ruberlei Gaino;Marcelo Carvalho Minhoto Teixeira
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 3-16
185 views Abstract
2012
water cooling thermal power measurement in a vacuum diffusion pump
;Luís Henrique Cardozo Amorin;Paulo Rogério Catarini da Silva;Jair Scarminio;Alexandre Urbano
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 67-72
141 views Abstract
View All 13 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.