chemical characterization of clay srm by x-ray fluorescence – results comparison from different laboratories
Clicks: 255
ID: 141630
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
255 views
30 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 13 articles by views in proceeding - 2018 international seminar on intelligent technology and its application, isitia 2018
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Two Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence equipments have been compared in order to verify its performance for clay characterization and potential application to the study in archaeometric field and industry. Two clay standard reference materials (SRM), IPT-42 and IPT-51 and one IAEA intercomparison sample were analyzed by two different methodologies and equipments. Asentamiento Universitario Zapala laboratory has a Shimadzu EDX-800HS bench top equipment and 13 elements from S to Zr were quantified in the standards. Applied Nuclear Physics Laboratory has a portable EDXRF system. It was possible to quantify K, Ti and Fe and qualitatively to identify Mn, Rb, Zn and Zr.
| Reference Key |
appoloni2009semina:chemical
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;Carlos Roberto Appoloni;Paulo Sérgio Parreira;Mônica Rueda;Susana Martínez Stagnaro;Fábio Lopes;Fábio Luiz Melquiades |
| Journal | proceeding - 2018 international seminar on intelligent technology and its application, isitia 2018 |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.