Indexed in Journament

radiologic technology

ISSN 1943-5657· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.0/100
Journament Score
#10,699
Journament Rank
35
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name radiol technol
Abbreviated Name radiologic technology
ISSN 1943-5657

Indexings

scopus ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2017
Serving, Following, and Leading in Health Care.
Vol. 88 , No. 6 , pp. 603-617
395 views Abstract
2015
improving of electrical channels for magnetotelluric sounding instrumentation
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 149-154
354 views DOI Abstract
2015
thermal-plume fibre optic tracking (t-pot) test for flow velocity measurement in groundwater boreholes
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 197-202
339 views DOI Abstract
2012
investigating thermal properties of gas-filled planetary regoliths using a thermal probe
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 7-21
318 views DOI Abstract
2017
data quality control and tools in passive seismic experiments exemplified on the czech broadband seismic pool mobnet in the alparray collaborative project
Vol. 6 , pp. 505-521
296 views DOI Abstract
2015
calibration of qm-moura three-axis magnetometer and gradiometer
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
286 views DOI Abstract
2017
taranis xgre and idee detection capability of terrestrial gamma-ray flashes and associated electron beams
Vol. 6 , pp. 239-256
270 views DOI Abstract
2014
a framework for benchmarking of homogenisation algorithm performance on the global scale
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 187-200
253 views DOI Abstract
2023
Consumption of Seafood Near Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant.
Vol. 95 , pp. 143-144
32 views
2017
re-establishing glacier monitoring in kyrgyzstan and uzbekistan, central asia
Vol. 6 , pp. 397-418
150 views DOI Abstract
2017
understanding of morphometric features for adequate water resource management in arid environments
Vol. 6 , pp. 293-300
176 views DOI Abstract
2017
saint petersburg magnetic observatory: from voeikovo subdivision to intermagnet certification
Vol. 6 , pp. 473-485
162 views DOI Abstract
2017
several years of experience with automatic di-flux systems: theory, validation and results
Vol. 6 , pp. 353-360
200 views DOI Abstract
2017
wind reconstruction algorithm for viking lander 1
Vol. 6 , pp. 217-229
140 views DOI Abstract
2017
data quality control and tools in passive seismic experiments exemplified on the czech broadband seismic pool mobnet in the alparray collaborative project
Vol. 6 , pp. 505-521
296 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.