several years of experience with automatic di-flux systems: theory, validation and results
Clicks: 201
ID: 210105
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
188 views
81 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The previous release of our automatic DI-flux instrument, called
AutoDIF mk2.2, has now been running continuously since June 2012 in the absolute
house of Dourbes magnetic observatory performing measurement every
30 min. A second one has been working in the tunnel of Conrad observatory
(Austria) since December 2013. After this proof of concept, we improved the
AutoDIF to version mk2.3, which was presented at the 16th IAGA workshop
in Hyderabad. As of publication, we have successfully deployed six AutoDIFs in various
environments: two in Dourbes (DOU), one in Manhay (MAB), one in Conrad (CON), one in
Daejeon (South Korea) and one is used for tests. The latter was installed for
10 months
in Chambon-la-Forêt (CLF) and, since 2016, has been in Kakioka (KAK). In this paper, we
will compare the automatic to the human-made measurements and discuss the
advantages and disadvantages of automatic measurements.
| Reference Key |
poncelet2017geoscientificseveral
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | ;A. Poncelet;A. Gonsette;J. Rasson |
| Journal | radiologic technology |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
10.5194/gi-6-353-2017
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.