Indexed in Journament

health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy

ISSN 1369-7625· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #9,034 of 33,995 indexed journals
10 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name health expect
Abbreviated Name health expect
ISSN 1369-7625

Publications Per Year

Articles (10)

2020
Cultural competency in dietetic diabetes care-A qualitative study of the dietician's perspective.
Jager, Mirjam;den Boeft, Andrea;Leij-Halfwerk, Susanne;van der Sande, Rob;van den Muijsenbergh, Maria;
461 views DOI Abstract
2020
A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co-design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health-care teams.
Pallesen, Kirsten Siig;Rogers, Lisa;Anjara, Sabrina;De Brún, Aoife;McAuliffe, Eilish;
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring the impact of participatory research in psychiatry: How the search for epistemic justifications obscures ethical considerations.
Friesen, Phoebe;Lignou, Sapfo;Sheehan, Mark;Singh, Ilina;
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.
Nyhof, Bryanna B;Wright, Frances C;Look Hong, Nicole J;Groot, Gary;Helyer, Lucy;Meiers, Pamela;Quan, May Lynn;Baxter, Nancy N;Urquhart, Robin;Warburton, Rebecca;Gagliardi, Anna R;
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient and public involvement in priority-setting decisions in England's Transforming NHS: An interview study with Clinical Commissioning Groups in South London sustainability transformation partnerships.
Coultas, Clare;Kieslich, Katharina;Littlejohns, Peter;
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 1223-1230
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners.
Akanuwe, Joseph N A;Black, Sharon;Owen, Sara;Siriwardena, Aloysius Niroshan;
382 views DOI Abstract
2014
Assessing the conceptual clarity and evidence base of quality criteria/standards developed for evaluating decision aids.
McDonald, Heather;Charles, Cathy;Gafni, Amiram;
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 232-43
376 views DOI Abstract
2003
Using nominal group technique to assess chronic pain, patients' perceived challenges and needs in a community health region
Dewar A;White M;Posade ST;Dillon W;;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
370 views Abstract
2019
Reasoning in the valuation of health-related quality of life: A qualitative content analysis of deliberations in a pilot study.
Gansen, Fabia;Klinger, Julian;
308 views DOI Abstract
2025
Perceptions and Experiences of Consumer Representatives on Patient Safety Investigation Teams: A Qualitative Analysis.
Hibbert, Peter D; Yu, Yinghua; Molloy, Charlotte J; Ames, Matthew; Brown, Duncan; Berrill, Jenny; Fernance, Zoe; Morris, Jennifer; Watson, Liat
Vol. 28 , pp. e70281
105 views DOI Abstract
2025
Perceptions and Experiences of Consumer Representatives on Patient Safety Investigation Teams: A Qualitative Analysis.
Hibbert, Peter D; Yu, Yinghua; Molloy, Charlotte J; Ames, Matthew; Brown, Duncan; Berrill, Jenny; Fernance, Zoe; Morris, Jennifer; Watson, Liat
Vol. 28 , pp. e70281
105 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cultural competency in dietetic diabetes care-A qualitative study of the dietician's perspective.
Jager, Mirjam;den Boeft, Andrea;Leij-Halfwerk, Susanne;van der Sande, Rob;van den Muijsenbergh, Maria;
461 views DOI Abstract
2020
A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co-design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health-care teams.
Pallesen, Kirsten Siig;Rogers, Lisa;Anjara, Sabrina;De Brún, Aoife;McAuliffe, Eilish;
442 views DOI Abstract
2020
Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners.
Akanuwe, Joseph N A;Black, Sharon;Owen, Sara;Siriwardena, Aloysius Niroshan;
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient and public involvement in priority-setting decisions in England's Transforming NHS: An interview study with Clinical Commissioning Groups in South London sustainability transformation partnerships.
Coultas, Clare;Kieslich, Katharina;Littlejohns, Peter;
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 1223-1230
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reasoning in the valuation of health-related quality of life: A qualitative content analysis of deliberations in a pilot study.
Gansen, Fabia;Klinger, Julian;
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring the impact of participatory research in psychiatry: How the search for epistemic justifications obscures ethical considerations.
Friesen, Phoebe;Lignou, Sapfo;Sheehan, Mark;Singh, Ilina;
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.
Nyhof, Bryanna B;Wright, Frances C;Look Hong, Nicole J;Groot, Gary;Helyer, Lucy;Meiers, Pamela;Quan, May Lynn;Baxter, Nancy N;Urquhart, Robin;Warburton, Rebecca;Gagliardi, Anna R;
413 views DOI Abstract
2014
Assessing the conceptual clarity and evidence base of quality criteria/standards developed for evaluating decision aids.
McDonald, Heather;Charles, Cathy;Gafni, Amiram;
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 232-43
376 views DOI Abstract
2003
Using nominal group technique to assess chronic pain, patients' perceived challenges and needs in a community health region
Dewar A;White M;Posade ST;Dillon W;;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
370 views Abstract
Journament Score
40.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #9,034 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.