Recommendations to improve patient-centred care for ductal carcinoma in situ: Qualitative focus groups with women.
Clicks: 430
ID: 47217
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
77.6
/100
430 views
293 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #4 of 10 articles by views in health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Patient-centred care (PCC) improves health-care experiences and outcomes. Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and clinicians have reported communication difficulties. Little prior research has studied how to improve communication and PCC for DCIS.This study explored how to achieve PCC for DCIS.Canadian women treated for DCIS from five provinces participated in semi-structured focus groups based on a 6-domain cancer-specific PCC framework to discuss communication about DCIS. Data were analysed using constant comparative technique.Thirty-five women aged 30 to 86 participated in five focus groups at five hospitals.Women said their clinicians used multiple approaches for fostering a healing relationship; however, most described an absence of desired information or behaviour to exchange information, respond to emotions, manage uncertainty, make decisions and enable self-management. Most women were confused by terminology, offered little information about the risks of progression/recurrence, uninformed about treatment benefits and risks, frustrated with lack of engagement in decision making, given little information about follow-up plans or self-care advice, and received no acknowledgement or offer of emotional support.By comparing the accounts of women with DCIS to a PCC framework, we identified limitations and inconsistencies in women's lived experience of communication about DCIS, and approaches by which clinicians can more consistently achieve PCC for DCIS. Future research should develop and evaluate informational tools to support PCC for DCIS.
| Reference Key |
nyhof2019recommendationshealth
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Nyhof, Bryanna B;Wright, Frances C;Look Hong, Nicole J;Groot, Gary;Helyer, Lucy;Meiers, Pamela;Quan, May Lynn;Baxter, Nancy N;Urquhart, Robin;Warburton, Rebecca;Gagliardi, Anna R; |
| Journal | health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/hex.12973
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.