Indexed in Journament

american journal of transplantation : official journal of the american society of transplantation and the american society of transplant surgeons

ISSN 1600-6143· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,426 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
54 Articles
Scores higher than 13.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name am j transplant
Abbreviated Name am j transplant
ISSN 1600-6143
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-journal-of-transplantation

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 15.7 7.8
Content Distribution 48.2 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (54)

2013
Tacrolimus predose concentrations do not predict the risk of acute rejection after renal transplantation: a pooled analysis from three randomized-controlled clinical trials(†).
Bouamar, R;Shuker, N;Hesselink, D A;Weimar, W;Ekberg, H;Kaplan, B;Bernasconi, C;van Gelder, T;
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 1253-61
483 views DOI Abstract
2020
Earliest cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) identified in solid organ transplant recipients in the United States.
Kates, Olivia S;Fisher, Cynthia E;Stankiewicz-Karita, Helen C;Shepherd, Amanda K;Church, E Chandler;Kapnadak, Siddhartha G;Lease, Erika D;Riedo, Francis X;Rakita, Robert M;Limaye, Ajit P;
467 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Swiss approach to the COVID-19 outbreak.
Moeckli, Beat;Peloso, Andrea;Oldani, Graziano;Orci, Lorenzo A;Banz, Vanessa;Dutkowski, Philipp;Toso, Christian;Berney, Thierry;
458 views DOI Abstract
2020
The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on Liver Transplantation programmes in Northern Italy.
Maggi, Umberto;De Carlis, Luciano;Yiu, Daniel;Colledan, Michele;Regalia, Enrico;Rossi, Giorgio;Angrisani, Marco;Consonni, Dario;Fornoni, Gianluca;Piccolo, Giuseppe;DeFeo, Tullia Maria;
446 views DOI Abstract
2009
Mycophenolate blood level monitoring: recent progress.
van Gelder, T;
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 1495-9
418 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reply to "Ethical Principles Governing Organ Transplantation Apply to Paired Exchange Programs".
Ladin, Keren;Kulkarni, Sanjay;
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
Response to "Reply to: 'The decreasing predictive power of MELD in an era of changing etiology of liver disease'".
Godfrey, Elizabeth L;Malik, Tahir H;Lai, Jennifer C;Mindikoglu, Ayse L;Galván, N Thao N;Cotton, Ronald T;O'Mahony, Christine A;Goss, John A;Rana, Abbas;
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Access to transplantation for persons with intellectual disability: Strategies for non-discrimination.
Chen, Ashton;Ahmad, Mahwish;Flescher, Andrew;Freeman, William L;Little, Stephanie;Martins, Paulo N;Veatch, Robert M;Wightman, Aaron;Ladin, Keren;
407 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a single-center case series from Spain.
Fernández-Ruiz, Mario;Andrés, Amado;Loinaz, Carmelo;Delgado, Juan F;López-Medrano, Francisco;San Juan, Rafael;González, Esther;Polanco, Natalia;Folgueira, María Dolores;Lalueza, Antonio;Lumbreras, Carlos;Aguado, José María;
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using (cell-free) DNA to incriminate rejection as the cause of kidney allograft dysfunction: Do we have a verdict?
Bloom, Roy D;
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 1609-1610
379 views DOI
2020
a quasi-experimental study on the decisions, behavioral regulation, and metacognition of ecuadorian men
;Karla Pérez-Lalama;Mabel Urrutia;Silvia Mancheno-Durán;David Balseca-Bolaños;Marco Gamboa-Proaño
Vol. 20 , No. 03 , pp. e7855-e7855
234 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reply to "Ethical Principles Governing Organ Transplantation Apply to Paired Exchange Programs".
Ladin, Keren;Kulkarni, Sanjay;
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on Liver Transplantation programmes in Northern Italy.
Maggi, Umberto;De Carlis, Luciano;Yiu, Daniel;Colledan, Michele;Regalia, Enrico;Rossi, Giorgio;Angrisani, Marco;Consonni, Dario;Fornoni, Gianluca;Piccolo, Giuseppe;DeFeo, Tullia Maria;
446 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Swiss approach to the COVID-19 outbreak.
Moeckli, Beat;Peloso, Andrea;Oldani, Graziano;Orci, Lorenzo A;Banz, Vanessa;Dutkowski, Philipp;Toso, Christian;Berney, Thierry;
458 views DOI Abstract
2020
Earliest cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) identified in solid organ transplant recipients in the United States.
Kates, Olivia S;Fisher, Cynthia E;Stankiewicz-Karita, Helen C;Shepherd, Amanda K;Church, E Chandler;Kapnadak, Siddhartha G;Lease, Erika D;Riedo, Francis X;Rakita, Robert M;Limaye, Ajit P;
467 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a single-center case series from Spain.
Fernández-Ruiz, Mario;Andrés, Amado;Loinaz, Carmelo;Delgado, Juan F;López-Medrano, Francisco;San Juan, Rafael;González, Esther;Polanco, Natalia;Folgueira, María Dolores;Lalueza, Antonio;Lumbreras, Carlos;Aguado, José María;
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Rejecting Bias: The Case Against Race Adjustment for OPO Performance in Communities of Color.
Goldberg, David;Doby, Brianna;Siminoff, Laura;Shah, Malay;Lynch, Raymond;
113 views DOI Abstract
2020
Response to "Reply to: 'The decreasing predictive power of MELD in an era of changing etiology of liver disease'".
Godfrey, Elizabeth L;Malik, Tahir H;Lai, Jennifer C;Mindikoglu, Ayse L;Galván, N Thao N;Cotton, Ronald T;O'Mahony, Christine A;Goss, John A;Rana, Abbas;
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Access to transplantation for persons with intellectual disability: Strategies for non-discrimination.
Chen, Ashton;Ahmad, Mahwish;Flescher, Andrew;Freeman, William L;Little, Stephanie;Martins, Paulo N;Veatch, Robert M;Wightman, Aaron;Ladin, Keren;
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using (cell-free) DNA to incriminate rejection as the cause of kidney allograft dysfunction: Do we have a verdict?
Bloom, Roy D;
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 1609-1610
379 views DOI
Journament Score
27.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,426 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

15.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

48.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.