american journal of transplantation : official journal of the american society of transplantation and the american society of transplant surgeons | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2096 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
40
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

american journal of transplantation : official journal of the american society of transplantation and the american society of transplant surgeons

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name am j transplant
Abbreviated Name am j transplant
ISSN 1600-6143
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-journal-of-transplantation
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (54 total)

2013
Tacrolimus predose concentrations do not predict the risk of acute rejection after renal transplantation: a pooled analysis from three randomized-controlled clinical trials(†).
Bouamar, R;Shuker, N;Hesselink, D A;Weimar, W;Ekberg, H;Kaplan, B;Bernasconi, C;van Gelder, T;
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 1253-61
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
Earliest cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) identified in solid organ transplant recipients in the United States.
Kates, Olivia S;Fisher, Cynthia E;Stankiewicz-Karita, Helen C;Shepherd, Amanda K;Church, E Chandler;Kapnadak, Siddhartha G;Lease, Erika D;Riedo, Francis X;Rakita, Robert M;Limaye, Ajit P;
382 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Swiss approach to the COVID-19 outbreak.
Moeckli, Beat;Peloso, Andrea;Oldani, Graziano;Orci, Lorenzo A;Banz, Vanessa;Dutkowski, Philipp;Toso, Christian;Berney, Thierry;
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reply to "Ethical Principles Governing Organ Transplantation Apply to Paired Exchange Programs".
Ladin, Keren;Kulkarni, Sanjay;
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Response to "Reply to: 'The decreasing predictive power of MELD in an era of changing etiology of liver disease'".
Godfrey, Elizabeth L;Malik, Tahir H;Lai, Jennifer C;Mindikoglu, Ayse L;Galván, N Thao N;Cotton, Ronald T;O'Mahony, Christine A;Goss, John A;Rana, Abbas;
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on Liver Transplantation programmes in Northern Italy.
Maggi, Umberto;De Carlis, Luciano;Yiu, Daniel;Colledan, Michele;Regalia, Enrico;Rossi, Giorgio;Angrisani, Marco;Consonni, Dario;Fornoni, Gianluca;Piccolo, Giuseppe;DeFeo, Tullia Maria;
356 views DOI Abstract
2009
Mycophenolate blood level monitoring: recent progress.
van Gelder, T;
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 1495-9
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Access to transplantation for persons with intellectual disability: Strategies for non-discrimination.
Chen, Ashton;Ahmad, Mahwish;Flescher, Andrew;Freeman, William L;Little, Stephanie;Martins, Paulo N;Veatch, Robert M;Wightman, Aaron;Ladin, Keren;
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using (cell-free) DNA to incriminate rejection as the cause of kidney allograft dysfunction: Do we have a verdict?
Bloom, Roy D;
Vol. 19 , No. 6 , pp. 1609-1610
332 views DOI
2020
COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: a single-center case series from Spain.
Fernández-Ruiz, Mario;Andrés, Amado;Loinaz, Carmelo;Delgado, Juan F;López-Medrano, Francisco;San Juan, Rafael;González, Esther;Polanco, Natalia;Folgueira, María Dolores;Lalueza, Antonio;Lumbreras, Carlos;Aguado, José María;
327 views DOI Abstract
View All 54 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
40
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.