bioorganic and medicinal chemistry letters | Journament

Journal Ranking

#587 / 33,938
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

bioorganic and medicinal chemistry letters

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name bioorganic and medicinal chemistry letters
Abbreviated Name bioorganic and medicinal chemistry letters
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (67 total)

2017
Anti-leishmanial and cytotoxic activities of amino acid-triazole hybrids: Synthesis, biological evaluation, molecular docking and in silico physico-chemical properties
Masood M.
Vol. 27 , pp. 1886-1891
450 views DOI
2018
Diversity-oriented synthesis of pyrazoles derivatives from flavones and isoflavones leads to the discovery of promising reversal agents of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans
Cui C.
Vol. 28 , pp. 1545-1549
326 views DOI
2016
Synthesis, antitumor activity and mechanism of action of novel 1,3-thiazole derivatives containing hydrazide–hydrazone and carboxamide moiety
He, H.
Vol. 26 , pp. 3263-3270
293 views DOI
2019
Synthesis of Isosteviol analogues as potential protective agents against Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in zebrafish embryos
Jayachandra, R.
Vol. 29 , pp. 1705-1709
287 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ciprofloxacin-1,2,3-triazole-isatin hybrids tethered via amide: Design, synthesis, and in vitro anti-mycobacterial activity evaluation
Chen, R.
Vol. 29 , pp. 2635-2637
278 views DOI
2009
Synthesis of aristolactam analogues and evaluation of their antitumor activity
Choi, Y.
Vol. 19 , pp. 3036-3040
270 views DOI
2019
Ultrasonication-ionic liquid synergy for the synthesis of new potent anti-tuberculosis 1,2,4-triazol-1-yl-pyrazole based spirooxindolopyrrolizidines
Pogaku, V.
Vol. 29 , pp. 1682-1687
258 views DOI
2014
Design and synthesis of phenolic hydrazide hydrazones as potent poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) inhibitors
Islam, R.
Vol. 24 , pp. 3802-3806
256 views DOI
2010
tensão superficial dinâmica e ângulo de contato de soluções aquosas com surfatantes em superfícies artificiais e naturais dynamic surface tension and contact angle of water solutions with spray surfactants in artificial and natural surfaces
;Cristina A. R. Iost;Carlos G. Raetano
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 670-680
256 views DOI Abstract
2019
Corrigendum to ‘Synthesis and biological evaluation of Doxorubicin-containing conjugate targeting PSMA’ (Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2019) 29(10) (1246–1255), (S0960894X19300617), (10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.01.040))
Ivanenkov, Y.
Vol. 29 , pp. 1688
255 views DOI
View All 67 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.