thermal science and engineering progress | Journament

Journal Ranking

#936 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

thermal science and engineering progress

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name thermal science and engineering progress
Abbreviated Name thermal science and engineering progress
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (86 total)

2019
Viscous dissipation performance on stagnation point flow of Jeffrey fluid inspired by internal heat generation and chemical reaction
Azhar, E.
Vol. 13 , pp. 0-0
339 views DOI
2018
genome-wide methylation patterns in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells: a comprehensive analysis combining medip-bisulfite, rna, and microrna sequencing data
;Yumin Wang;Tingting Qin;Wangqiang Hu;Binghua Chen;Meijie Dai;Gang Xu
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 32-
334 views DOI Abstract
2010
identification of carbohydrate metabolism genes in the metagenome of a marine biofilm community shown to be dominated by gammaproteobacteria and bacteroidetes
;Jennifer L. Edwards;Darren L. Smith;John Connolly;James E. McDonald;Michael J. Cox;Ian Joint;Alan J. McCarthy;Clive Edwards
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 371-384
327 views DOI Abstract
2018
applications of yeast synthetic biology geared towards the production of biopharmaceuticals
;Roy S. K. Walker;Isak S. Pretorius
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 340-
312 views DOI Abstract
2018
genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the hd-zip gene family in wheat (triticum aestivum l.)
;Hong Yue;Duntao Shu;Meng Wang;Guangwei Xing;Haoshuang Zhan;Xianghong Du;Weining Song;Xiaojun Nie
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 70-
306 views DOI Abstract
2018
recta: regulon identification based on comparative genomics and transcriptomics analysis
;Xin Chen;Anjun Ma;Adam McDermaid;Hanyuan Zhang;Chao Liu;Huansheng Cao;Qin Ma
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 278-
300 views DOI Abstract
2017
deep transcriptome sequencing of two green algae, chara vulgaris and chlamydomonas reinhardtii,  provides no evidence of organellar rna editing
;A. Bruce Cahoon;John A. Nauss;Conner D. Stanley;Ali Qureshi
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 80-
296 views DOI Abstract
2018
antibiotic resistance genetic markers and integrons in white soft cheese: aspects of clinical resistome and potentiality of horizontal gene transfer
;Ana Caroline L. de Paula;Julliane D. Medeiros;Analice C. de Azevedo;Jéssica M. de Assis Chagas;Vânia L. da Silva;Cláudio G. Diniz
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 106-
285 views DOI Abstract
2018
low maternal microbiota sharing across gut, breast milk and vagina, as revealed by 16s rrna gene and reduced metagenomic sequencing
;Ekaterina Avershina;Inga Leena Angell;Melanie Simpson;Ola Storrø;Torbjørn Øien;Roar Johnsen;Knut Rudi
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 231-
274 views DOI Abstract
2017
c-myc—making liver sick: role of c-myc in hepatic cell function, homeostasis and disease
;Kang Zheng;Francisco Javier Cubero;Yulia A. Nevzorova
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 123-
272 views DOI Abstract
View All 86 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.