waste management (new york, ny) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1258 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

waste management (new york, ny)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name waste manag
Abbreviated Name waste manag
ISSN 1879-2456
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/waste-management
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (145 total)

2020
Assessment of municipal solid waste selective collection scenarios with geographic information systems in Bolivia.
Ferronato, Navarro;Preziosi, Gianluca;Gorritty Portillo, Marcelo Antonio;Guisbert Lizarazu, Edith Gabriela;Torretta, Vincenzo;
Vol. 102 , pp. 919-931
509 views DOI Abstract
2019
Digitalisation and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy oriented waste management - A review.
Sarc, R;Curtis, A;Kandlbauer, L;Khodier, K;Lorber, K E;Pomberger, R;
Vol. 95 , pp. 476-492
480 views DOI Abstract
2019
Municipal solid waste (MSW): Strategies to improve salt affected soil sustainability: A review.
Meena, M D;Yadav, R K;Narjary, B;Yadav, Gajender;Jat, H S;Sheoran, P;Meena, M K;Antil, R S;Meena, B L;Singh, H V;Singh Meena, Vijay;Rai, P K;Ghosh, Avijit;Moharana, P C;
Vol. 84 , pp. 38-53
428 views DOI Abstract
2020
Challenges and opportunities of solvent-based additive extraction methods for plastic recycling.
Ügdüler, Sibel;Van Geem, Kevin M;Roosen, Martijn;Delbeke, Elisabeth I P;De Meester, Steven;
Vol. 104 , pp. 148-182
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Separation mechanism of polyvinyl chloride and copper components from swollen electric cables by mechanical agitation.
Lu, Jiaqi;Xu, Jing;Kumagai, Shogo;Kameda, Tomohito;Saito, Yuko;Yoshioka, Toshiaki;
Vol. 93 , pp. 54-62
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of collection portfolio expansion on key performance indicators of the Dutch recycling system for Post-Consumer Plastic Packaging Waste, a comparison between 2014 and 2017.
Brouwer, Marieke;Picuno, Caterina;Thoden van Velzen, Eggo U;Kuchta, Kerstin;De Meester, Steven;Ragaert, Kim;
Vol. 100 , pp. 112-121
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synergistic effect of hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge with fruit and agricultural wastes on hydrochar fuel quality and combustion behavior.
He, Chao;Zhang, Zhao;Ge, Chaofeng;Liu, Wen;Tang, Yetao;Zhuang, Xiuzheng;Qiu, Rongliang;
Vol. 100 , pp. 171-181
402 views DOI Abstract
2017
Sustainable use of tannery sludge in brick manufacturing in Bangladesh.
Juel, Md Ariful Islam;Mizan, Al;Ahmed, Tanvir;
Vol. 60 , pp. 259-269
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mechanism exploration on the aluminum supplementation coupling the electrokinetics-activating geopolymerization that reinforces the solidification of the municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes.
Huang, Tao;Zhou, Lulu;Chen, Long;Liu, Wanhui;Zhang, Shuwen;Liu, Longfei;
Vol. 103 , pp. 361-369
382 views DOI Abstract
2015
Household-level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph, Ontario.
Parizeau, Kate;von Massow, Mike;Martin, Ralph;
Vol. 35 , pp. 207-17
374 views DOI Abstract
View All 145 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.