atmospheric measurement techniques | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1878 / 33,943
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

atmospheric measurement techniques

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name atmospheric measurement techniques
Abbreviated Name atmospheric measurement techniques
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2016
Effect of secondary organic aerosol coating thickness on the real-time detection and characterization of biomass-burning soot by two particle mass spectrometers
Ahern, A. T.;Subramanian, R.;Saliba, G.;Lipsky, E. M.;Lipsky, E. M.;Donahue, N. M.;Sullivan, R. C.;
Vol. 9 , pp. 6117-6137
427 views Abstract
2018
Wave-optics uncertainty propagation and regression-based bias model in GNSS radio occultation bending angle retrievals
Gorbunov, M. E.;Gorbunov, M. E.;Kirchengast, G.;Kirchengast, G.;
Vol. 11 , pp. 111-125
422 views Abstract
2016
Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 1: Vertical resolution
Leblanc, T.;Sica, R. J.;Gijsel, J. A. E. van;Godin-Beekmann, S.;Haefele, A.;Trickl, T.;Payen, G.;Gabarrot, F.;
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. 4029-4049
396 views Abstract
2015
Correction of raindrop size distributions measured by Parsivel disdrometers, using a two-dimensional video disdrometer as a reference
Raupach, T. H.;Berne, A.;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 343-365
374 views Abstract
2014
Influence of changes in humidity on dry temperature in GPS RO climatologies
Danzer, J.;Foelsche, U.;Scherllin-Pirscher, B.;Schwärz, M.;
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 2883-2896
372 views Abstract
2016
Validating MODIS above-cloud aerosol optical depth retrieved from “color ratio” algorithm using direct measurements made by NASA's airborne AATS and 4STAR sensors
Jethva, H.;Torres, O.;Remer, L.;Redemann, J.;Livingston, J.;Dunagan, S.;Shinozuka, Y.;Kacenelenbogen, M.;Rosenheimer, M. S.;Spurr, R.;
Vol. 9 , No. 10 , pp. 5053-5062
369 views Abstract
2014
БОЯРСТВО КИЇВСЬКОЇ ЗЕМЛІ В ХІІІ–ХІv ст.
;Д. Г. Руднік
Vol. 37 , pp. 13-19
367 views Abstract
2011
Long-term stability of TES satellite radiance measurements
Connor, T. C.;Shephard, M. W.;Payne, V. H.;Cady-Pereira, K. E.;Kulawik, S. S.;Luo, M.;Osterman, G.;Lampel, M.;
Vol. 4 , No. 7 , pp. 1481-1490
358 views Abstract
2019
Characterization and application of artificial light sources for nighttime aerosol optical depth retrievals using the Visible Infrared Imager Radiometer Suite Day/Night Band
Zhang, J.
Vol. 12 , pp. 3209-3222
323 views DOI
2018
A steady-state continuous flow chamber for the study of daytime and nighttime chemistry under atmospherically relevant NO levels
Zhang, X.;Zhang, X.;Ortega, J.;Ortega, J.;Huang, Y.;Shertz, S.;Tyndall, G. S.;Orlando, J. J.;
Vol. 11 , pp. 2537-2551
315 views Abstract
View All 28 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.