Wave-optics uncertainty propagation and regression-based bias model in GNSS radio occultation bending angle retrievals
Clicks: 374
ID: 59612
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
4.8
/100
16 views
16 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
A new reference occultation processing system (rOPS) will include a Global
Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) radio occultation (RO) retrieval chain
with integrated uncertainty propagation. In this paper, we focus on
wave-optics bending angle (BA) retrieval in the lower troposphere and introduce
(1) an empirically estimated boundary layer bias (BLB) model then employed to
reduce the systematic uncertainty of excess phases and bending angles in about the
lowest 2 km of the troposphere and (2) the estimation of
(residual) systematic uncertainties and their propagation together with
random uncertainties from excess phase to bending angle profiles. Our BLB
model describes the estimated bias of the excess phase transferred from the
estimated bias of the bending angle, for which the model is built, informed
by analyzing refractivity fluctuation statistics shown to induce such biases.
The model is derived from regression analysis using a large ensemble of
Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate
(COSMIC) RO observations and concurrent European Centre for Medium-Range
Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) analysis fields. It is formulated in
terms of predictors and adaptive functions (powers and cross products of predictors),
where we use six main predictors derived from observations: impact altitude,
latitude, bending angle and its standard deviation, canonical transform (CT)
amplitude, and its fluctuation index. Based on an ensemble of test days,
independent of the days of data used for the regression analysis to establish
the BLB model, we find the model very effective for bias reduction and capable
of reducing bending angle and corresponding refractivity biases by about a
factor of 5. The estimated residual systematic uncertainty, after the BLB
profile subtraction, is lower bounded by the uncertainty from the (indirect) use
of ECMWF analysis fields but is significantly lower than the systematic
uncertainty without BLB correction. The systematic and random uncertainties
are propagated from excess phase to bending angle profiles, using a
perturbation approach and the wave-optical method recently introduced by
Gorbunov and Kirchengast (2015), starting with estimated excess phase
uncertainties. The results are encouraging and this uncertainty propagation
approach combined with BLB correction enables a robust reduction and
quantification of the uncertainties of excess phases and bending angles in
the lower troposphere.
| Reference Key |
gorbunov2018waveopticsatmospheric
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gorbunov, M. E.;Gorbunov, M. E.;Kirchengast, G.;Kirchengast, G.; |
| Journal | atmospheric measurement techniques |
| Year | 2018 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.