mediterranean journal of mathematics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2567 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ 3 أسابيع

mediterranean journal of mathematics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
scopus ulakbim
الاسم المختصر mediterranean journal of mathematics
الاسم المختصر mediterranean journal of mathematics
ISSN 1660-5446
الهدف والنطاق
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/9
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2019
On the Normality of a Class of Monomial Ideals via the Newton Polyhedron
Al-Ayyoub, I.
Vol. 16 , pp. 0-0
257 views DOI
2011
o “arrastão” de carcavelos como onda noticiosa the carcavelos mugging as a media hype
;Gonçalo Pereira Rosa
, No. 198 , pp. 115-135
236 views Abstract
2011
the radical right ineurope, between slogans and voting behavior a direita radical na europa, entre slogans e comportamento de voto
;Nicolò Conti
, No. 201 , pp. 633-652
223 views Abstract
2010
da sodomita à lésbica: o género nas representações do homo-erotismo feminino from the sodomite to the lesbian: gender in the representations of female homo-eroticism
;Ana Maria Brandão
, No. 195 , pp. 307-327
207 views Abstract
2020
Error Analysis of Jacobi Spectral Galerkin and Multi-Galerkin Methods for Weakly Singular Volterra Integral Equations
Kant, K.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
192 views DOI
2020
Correction to: Solutions of Complex Fermat-Type Partial Difference and Differential-Difference Equations (Mediterranean Journal of Mathematics, (2018), 15, 6, (227), 10.1007/s00009-018-1274-x)
Xu, L.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
166 views DOI
2011
paisagem material, paisagem simbólica e identidade no concelho de castelo de vide material landscape, symbolic landscape, and identity in the municipality of castelo de vide
;Júlia Carolino;Teresa Pinto-Correia
, No. 198 , pp. 89-113
157 views Abstract
2006
<title language="eng">civilising subjects: metropole and colony in the english imagination, 1830-1867
;João Pedro Marques
, No. 178 , pp. 249-255
155 views
2012
a antropologia numa europa em crise: desafios e oportunidades
;Susana Narotzky
, No. 204 , pp. 725-735
152 views
2004
história da caixa geral de depósitos, 1876-1910, política e finanças no liberalismo português
;Guilherme D’Oliveira Martins
, No. 172 , pp. 666-671
144 views
View All 31 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.