gynecologic and obstetric investigation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#730 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ 4 أيام

gynecologic and obstetric investigation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
scopus ncbi ulakbim
الاسم المختصر gynecol obstet invest
الاسم المختصر gynecologic and obstetric investigation
ISSN 1423-002X
الهدف والنطاق
URL https://www.karger.com/Journal/Home/223845
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2019
Normality Ranges of Menstrual Fluid Volume during Reproductive Life Using Direct Quantification of Menses with Vaginal Cups
Donoso, M.
Vol. 84 , pp. 390-395
354 views DOI
2012
Does vaginal irrigation with saline solution in women with infectious vaginitis contribute to the clinical and microbiological results of antibiotic therapy?
Derbent, Aysel Uysal;Ulukanlıgil, Mustafa;Keskin, Esra Aktepe;Soylu, Gül;Kafalı, Hasan;
Vol. 73 , No. 3 , pp. 195-200
343 views DOI Abstract
2001
ketahanan dan viabilitas probiotik bakteri asam laktat selama proses pembuatan kultur kering dengan metode freeze dan spray drying [survival and viability of lactid acid bacteria probiotic during production of dried culture using freeze and spray drying methods]
;Erni Harmayani 1);Ngatirah 2);Endang S. Rahayu 1);Tyas Utami 1)
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 126-132
300 views Abstract
2012
structural analysis of spray-dried coconut shell liquid smoke powder [analisis struktural bubuk asap cair batok kelapa hasil pengeringan semprot]
;Yudi Pranoto2);Bambang Setiaji3);Purnama Darmadji2);Satrijo Saloko1)*
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 173-178
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of Estrogen Receptor α Gene Polymorphism and its Expression with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
Li, Chao;Qiao, Binglong;Zhou, Yubin;Qi, Weihong;Ma, Chunling;Zheng, Lin;
, pp. 1-8
270 views DOI Abstract
2013
aktivitas antioksidan antosianin beras ketan hitam selama fermentasi [antioxidant activity of anthocyanin of black glutinous rice during fermentation]
;Nanik Suhartatik1)*;Muhammad Nur Cahyanto2);Sri Raharjo2);Endang S. Rahayu2)
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 115-119
260 views DOI Abstract
1990
Atrial natriuretic peptide and progesterone in ovarian follicular fluid
Steegers, E.
Vol. 29 , pp. 185-187
260 views DOI
2014
modifikasi warna, tektur dan aroma tempe setelah diproses dengan karbon dioksida superkritik [the modification of color, texture, and aroma of tempe processed with supercritical carbon dioxide]
;Maria Erna Kustyawati1)*;Filli Pratama2);Daniel Saputra2) ;Agus Wijaya2)
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 168-175
255 views DOI Abstract
2016
purifikasi dan profil protein ovotransferrin dari eggshell membrane telur ayam ras dan buras
;Risa Fazriyati Siregar;Ahmad Ni’matullah Al–Baarri;Antonius Hintono;Yoyok Budi Pramono;Setya Budi Muhammad Abduh
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 87-94
246 views DOI Abstract
2009
pengaruh cacl2 dan edible film terhadap penghambatan chilling injury buah nangka kupas [effect of cacl2 and edible film on chilling injury inhibition of fresh-cut jackfruits]
;Ida Bagus Banyuro Partha1);Suparmo2);Moh. Ali Joko Wasono3);Maria Ulfah1)
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 62-68
241 views Abstract
View All 28 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.