econometric reviews | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3012 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

econometric reviews

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci soc
Short Name econometric reviews
Abbreviated Name econometric reviews
ISSN 0747-4938
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lecr20
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2009
fluoxetina: indícios de uso inadequado fluoxetine: indication of inadequate use
Vol. 58 , No. 2 , pp. 97-100
408 views DOI Abstract
2013
the impact of depression on survival of parkinson's disease patients: a five-year study o impacto da depressão na sobrevida de pacientes com doença de parkinson: cinco anos de estudo
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. 8-12
395 views Abstract
2010
sintomas depressivos no câncer de mama: inventário de depressão de beck - short form depressive symptoms in breast cancer: beck depression inventory - short form
Vol. 59 , No. 2 , pp. 106-110
391 views DOI Abstract
predicting response to treatment and discriminating bipolar and depression symptoms using hamilton depression rating scale
Vol. 66 , No. 3 , pp. 125-130
375 views DOI Abstract
2011
tentativas de suicídio e mortalidade por suicídio em um município no interior da bahia
Vol. 60 , No. 4 , pp. 294-300
351 views DOI Abstract
preliminary stages of cross-cultural adaptation of the brazilian portuguese version of mcmaster family assessment device
Vol. 65 , No. 3 , pp. 201-208
345 views DOI Abstract
2009
eating behavior and body image among psychology students comportamento alimentar e imagem corporal entre estudantes de psicologia
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 150-155
318 views DOI Abstract
2011
prevalência de transtornos mentais comuns e fatores associados em uma população assistida por equipes do programa saúde da família
Vol. 60 , No. 3 , pp. 221-226
295 views DOI Abstract
2010
imagem corporal em adolescentes: associação com a maturação sexual e sintomas de transtornos alimentares body image among adolescents: association with sexual maturation and symptoms of eating disorders
Vol. 59 , No. 3 , pp. 198-202
288 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.