Biochemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#228 / 33,850
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 13 hours ago

Biochemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Biochemistry
Abbreviated Name biochemistry
ISSN 0006-2960
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (73 total)

2015
Binding of substrate locks the electrochemistry of CRY-DASH into DNA repair
Gindt, Y.
Vol. 54 , pp. 2802-2805
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tuning Mechanism through Buffer Dependence of Hydrogen Evolution Catalyzed by a Cobalt Mini-enzyme
Le JM;Alachouzos G;Chino M;Frontier AJ;Lombardi A;Bren KL;;
Vol. 59 , No. 12 , pp. -
321 views Abstract
1991
Characterization of oligosaccharide structures on a chimeric respiratory syncytial virus protein expressed in insect cell line Sf9
Wathen MW;Aeed PA;Elhammer AP;;
Vol. 30 , No. 11 , pp. -
316 views Abstract
2020
Structural Elucidation of Peptide Binding to KLHL-12, a Substrate Specific Adapter Protein in a Cul3-Ring E3 Ligase Complex.
Zhao, Bin;Payne, William G;Sai, Jiqing;Lu, Zhenwei;Olejniczak, Edward T;Fesik, Stephen W;
299 views DOI Abstract
2020
DNA Ligase Connects Two Fragments Having Exceptionally Short Complementary Termini at High Temperatures.
Wang, Jing;Zhu, Jianming;Wang, Chenru;Zhou, Guangqing;Yu, Xin;Fan, Huijun;An, Ran;Komiyama, Makoto;Liang, Xingguo;
289 views DOI Abstract
2004
Truncated carboxyl-terminal fragments of beta-amyloid precursor protein are processed to amyloid beta-proteins 40 and 42.
Funamoto, Satoru;Morishima-Kawashima, Maho;Tanimura, Yu;Hirotani, Naoko;Saido, Takaomi C;Ihara, Yasuo;
Vol. 43 , No. 42 , pp. 13532-40
272 views Abstract
1973
Purification and characterization of the 4-aminobutyrate--2,ketoglutarate transaminase from mouse brain
Schousboe A;Wu JY;Roberts E;;
Vol. 12 , No. 15 , pp. -
255 views Abstract
2008
somatotype and anthropometry in brazilian national volleyball teams
;Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco Cabral;Suzet de Araújo Tinoco Cabral;Gilmario Ricarte Batista;Jose Fernandes Filho;Maria Irany knackfuss
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 67-72
254 views DOI Abstract
1975
Kinetics of glycogen phosphorylase a with a series of semisynthetic, branched saccharides. A model for binding of polysaccharide substrates.
Hu, H Y;Gold, A M;
Vol. 14 , No. 10 , pp. 2224-30
252 views Abstract
2016
Development of Novel Bis(indolyl)-hydrazide-Hydrazone Derivatives as Potent Microtubule-Targeting Cytotoxic Agents against A549 Lung Cancer Cells
Das, Mukherjee D.
Vol. 55 , pp. 3020-3035
241 views DOI
View All 73 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.