Indexed in Journament

Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association

ISSN 1740-8261· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,207 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
138 Articles
Scores higher than 10.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Vet Radiol Ultrasound
Abbreviated Name vet radiol ultrasound
ISSN 1740-8261
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17408261

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 7.1 13.4
Content Distribution 60.0 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (138)

2017
comparison of airtraq™, mccoy™ and macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: a randomised clinical trial
;Vinod Hosalli;B K Arjun;Uday Ambi;Shivanand Hulakund
Vol. 61 , No. 4 , pp. 332-337
544 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessment of variation in depth of brachial plexus using ultrasound for supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery
;Tuhin Mistry;Vandana Mangal;Gaurav Sharma;Aachu Agrawal
Vol. 60 , No. 6 , pp. 393-397
446 views DOI Abstract
2017
randomised controlled trial of central venous catheterisation through external jugular vein: a comparison of success with or without body manoeuvres
;Rohan Magoon;Surender Kumar Malhotra;Vikas Saini;Ridhima Sharma;Jasleen Kaur
Vol. 61 , No. 12 , pp. 985-989
424 views DOI Abstract
2014
survival pattern in patients with acute organophosphate poisoning on mechanical ventilation: a retrospective intensive care unit-based study in a tertiary care teaching hospital
;Syed M Ahmed;Bikramjit Das;Abu Nadeem;Rajiv K Samal
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 11-17
395 views DOI Abstract
2011
job satisfaction and stress levels among anaesthesiologists of south india
;Rachel Cherian Koshy;Bhagyalakshmi Ramesh;Shabana Khan;Anand Sivaramakrishnan
Vol. 55 , No. 5 , pp. 513-517
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET-CT aids in detection of soft-tissue injuries for dogs with thoracic or pelvic limb lameness.
Frank, Ilan;Mann, Kelly;Duerr, Felix;
356 views DOI Abstract
2018
perioperative monitoring of intracranial pressure using optic nerve sheath diameter in paediatric liver transplantation
;Atish Pal;Purnima Dhar;Neerav Goyal
Vol. 62 , No. 11 , pp. 892-895
353 views DOI Abstract
2017
revisiting the applicability of adult early post-operative nausea and vomiting risk factors for the paediatric patient: a prospective study using cotinine levels in children undergoing adenotonsillectomies
;Destiny F Chau;Arundathi Reddy;Patrick Breheny;Anna Rebecca Young;Eric Ashford;Megan Song;Christina Zhang;Tammy Taylor;Abbas Younes;Turaj Vazifedan
Vol. 61 , No. 12 , pp. 964-971
347 views DOI Abstract
2014
intrathecal clonidine with hyperbaric bupivacaine administered as a mixture and sequentially in caesarean section: a randomised controlled study
;Prachee Sachan;Nidhi Kumar;J P Sharma
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 287-292
330 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of the effect of pre-operative over-fasting on post-operative vomiting in children undergoing bone marrow aspiration at a tertiary care setting in sri lanka: a prospective cohort study
;Vidura Jayasinghe;P K Buddhika Mahesh;C M D Sooriaarachchi;Jimutha Jayalath;Weranga Karunarathne;S N Liyanage
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 366-370
320 views DOI Abstract
2022
Comparison of error rates between four pretrained DenseNet convolutional neural network models and 13 board-certified veterinary radiologists when evaluating 15 labels of canine thoracic radiographs.
Adrien-Maxence, Hespel;Emilie, Boissady;Alois, De La Comble;Michelle, Acierno;Kate, Alexander;Mylene, Auger;David, Biller;Marie, de Swarte;Jason, Fuerst;Eric, Green;Séamus, Hoey;Kevin, Koernig;Alison, Lee;Megan, MacLellan;Hester, McAllister;Jaime, Rechy Jr;Zhu, Xiaojuan;Micaela, Zarelli;Federica, Morandi;
Vol. 63 , No. 4 , pp. 456-468
186 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET-CT aids in detection of soft-tissue injuries for dogs with thoracic or pelvic limb lameness.
Frank, Ilan;Mann, Kelly;Duerr, Felix;
356 views DOI Abstract
2018
kawasaki disease and general anaesthesia: the know - hows
;Vrushali C Ponde;Vinit Vinod Bedekar;Carlo A Manalang
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 234-235
193 views DOI
2018
study of the impact of training of registered nurses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a tertiary care centre on patient mortality
;Mayureshkumar Pareek;Vandana Parmar;Jigisha Badheka;Nirmalyo Lodh
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 381-384
311 views DOI Abstract
2018
difficult intubation: ‘beyond the vocal cords’
;Saurabh Mittal;Anant Mohan;Karan Madan
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 476-477
195 views DOI
2018
severe angioedema of laryngeal inlet in a woman receiving telmisartan therapy undergoing breast conservation surgery
;Bikram Kishore Behera;Satyajeet Misra;Madhabananda Kar
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 393-395
170 views DOI
2018
reversal agents: do we need to administer with neuromuscular monitoring – an observational study
;Shilpa Goyal;Nikhil Kothari;Deepak Chaudhary;Shilpi Verma;Pooja Bihani;Mahaveer Singh Rodha
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 219-224
143 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of the effect of pre-operative over-fasting on post-operative vomiting in children undergoing bone marrow aspiration at a tertiary care setting in sri lanka: a prospective cohort study
;Vidura Jayasinghe;P K Buddhika Mahesh;C M D Sooriaarachchi;Jimutha Jayalath;Weranga Karunarathne;S N Liyanage
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 366-370
320 views DOI Abstract
2018
perioperative monitoring of intracranial pressure using optic nerve sheath diameter in paediatric liver transplantation
;Atish Pal;Purnima Dhar;Neerav Goyal
Vol. 62 , No. 11 , pp. 892-895
353 views DOI Abstract
2018
whatsapp: is it a solution to daily human resources management in institutional practice?
;Sumitra G Bakshi
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 236-236
270 views DOI
Journament Score
28.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,207 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.