Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2569 / 33,954
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Vet Radiol Ultrasound
Abbreviated Name vet radiol ultrasound
ISSN 1740-8261
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17408261
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (138 total)

2017
comparison of airtraq™, mccoy™ and macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation: a randomised clinical trial
;Vinod Hosalli;B K Arjun;Uday Ambi;Shivanand Hulakund
Vol. 61 , No. 4 , pp. 332-337
514 views DOI Abstract
2017
randomised controlled trial of central venous catheterisation through external jugular vein: a comparison of success with or without body manoeuvres
;Rohan Magoon;Surender Kumar Malhotra;Vikas Saini;Ridhima Sharma;Jasleen Kaur
Vol. 61 , No. 12 , pp. 985-989
388 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessment of variation in depth of brachial plexus using ultrasound for supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery
;Tuhin Mistry;Vandana Mangal;Gaurav Sharma;Aachu Agrawal
Vol. 60 , No. 6 , pp. 393-397
364 views DOI Abstract
2014
survival pattern in patients with acute organophosphate poisoning on mechanical ventilation: a retrospective intensive care unit-based study in a tertiary care teaching hospital
;Syed M Ahmed;Bikramjit Das;Abu Nadeem;Rajiv K Samal
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 11-17
364 views DOI Abstract
2011
job satisfaction and stress levels among anaesthesiologists of south india
;Rachel Cherian Koshy;Bhagyalakshmi Ramesh;Shabana Khan;Anand Sivaramakrishnan
Vol. 55 , No. 5 , pp. 513-517
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET-CT aids in detection of soft-tissue injuries for dogs with thoracic or pelvic limb lameness.
Frank, Ilan;Mann, Kelly;Duerr, Felix;
321 views DOI Abstract
2018
perioperative monitoring of intracranial pressure using optic nerve sheath diameter in paediatric liver transplantation
;Atish Pal;Purnima Dhar;Neerav Goyal
Vol. 62 , No. 11 , pp. 892-895
306 views DOI Abstract
2017
revisiting the applicability of adult early post-operative nausea and vomiting risk factors for the paediatric patient: a prospective study using cotinine levels in children undergoing adenotonsillectomies
;Destiny F Chau;Arundathi Reddy;Patrick Breheny;Anna Rebecca Young;Eric Ashford;Megan Song;Christina Zhang;Tammy Taylor;Abbas Younes;Turaj Vazifedan
Vol. 61 , No. 12 , pp. 964-971
303 views DOI Abstract
2014
intrathecal clonidine with hyperbaric bupivacaine administered as a mixture and sequentially in caesarean section: a randomised controlled study
;Prachee Sachan;Nidhi Kumar;J P Sharma
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 287-292
296 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of the effect of pre-operative over-fasting on post-operative vomiting in children undergoing bone marrow aspiration at a tertiary care setting in sri lanka: a prospective cohort study
;Vidura Jayasinghe;P K Buddhika Mahesh;C M D Sooriaarachchi;Jimutha Jayalath;Weranga Karunarathne;S N Liyanage
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 366-370
282 views DOI Abstract
View All 138 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.