Indexed in Journament

Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association

ISSN 1740-8261· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5/100
Journament Score
#10,398
Journament Rank
138
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Vet Radiol Ultrasound
Abbreviated Name vet radiol ultrasound
ISSN 1740-8261
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17408261

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (138)

2017
2016
assessment of variation in depth of brachial plexus using ultrasound for supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery
Vol. 60 , No. 6 , pp. 393-397
435 views DOI Abstract
2017
randomised controlled trial of central venous catheterisation through external jugular vein: a comparison of success with or without body manoeuvres
Vol. 61 , No. 12 , pp. 985-989
415 views DOI Abstract
2011
job satisfaction and stress levels among anaesthesiologists of south india
Vol. 55 , No. 5 , pp. 513-517
354 views DOI Abstract
2018
perioperative monitoring of intracranial pressure using optic nerve sheath diameter in paediatric liver transplantation
Vol. 62 , No. 11 , pp. 892-895
338 views DOI Abstract
2017
revisiting the applicability of adult early post-operative nausea and vomiting risk factors for the paediatric patient: a prospective study using cotinine levels in children undergoing adenotonsillectomies
Vol. 61 , No. 12 , pp. 964-971
329 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of the effect of pre-operative over-fasting on post-operative vomiting in children undergoing bone marrow aspiration at a tertiary care setting in sri lanka: a prospective cohort study
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 366-370
310 views DOI Abstract
2022
Comparison of error rates between four pretrained DenseNet convolutional neural network models and 13 board-certified veterinary radiologists when evaluating 15 labels of canine thoracic radiographs.
Vol. 63 , No. 4 , pp. 456-468
174 views DOI Abstract
2018
kawasaki disease and general anaesthesia: the know - hows
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 234-235
182 views DOI
2018
study of the impact of training of registered nurses in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a tertiary care centre on patient mortality
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 381-384
294 views DOI Abstract
2018
difficult intubation: ‘beyond the vocal cords’
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 476-477
185 views DOI
2018
severe angioedema of laryngeal inlet in a woman receiving telmisartan therapy undergoing breast conservation surgery
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 393-395
155 views DOI
2018
reversal agents: do we need to administer with neuromuscular monitoring – an observational study
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 219-224
130 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of the effect of pre-operative over-fasting on post-operative vomiting in children undergoing bone marrow aspiration at a tertiary care setting in sri lanka: a prospective cohort study
Vol. 62 , No. 5 , pp. 366-370
310 views DOI Abstract
2018
perioperative monitoring of intracranial pressure using optic nerve sheath diameter in paediatric liver transplantation
Vol. 62 , No. 11 , pp. 892-895
338 views DOI Abstract
2018
whatsapp: is it a solution to daily human resources management in institutional practice?
Vol. 62 , No. 3 , pp. 236-236
257 views DOI
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.