addiction (abingdon, england) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5944 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

addiction (abingdon, england)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name addiction
Abbreviated Name addiction
ISSN 1360-0443
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13600443
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (124 total)

2009
Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature
Shahab L;McEwen A;;
Vol. 104 , No. 11 , pp. -
553 views Abstract
2008
Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial
Riper H;Kramer J;Smit F;Conijn B;Schippers G;Cuijpers P;;
Vol. 103 , No. 2 , pp. -
445 views Abstract
2019
The changing patterns and correlates of population-level polysubstance use in Australian youth: A multi-group latent class analysis of nationally representative samples spanning 12 year.
Chan, Gary;Connor, Jason;Hall, Wayne;Leung, Janni;
433 views DOI Abstract
2002
The association between knowledge of hepatitis C virus status and risk behaviors in injection drug users
Kwiatkowski CF;Fortuin Corsi K;Booth RE;;
Vol. 97 , No. 10 , pp. -
432 views Abstract
2019
The evolution of addiction treatment and harm reduction programs in Iran: a chaotic response or a synergistic diversity?
Ekhtiari, Hamed;Noroozi, Alireza;Farhoudian, Ali;Radfar, Seyed Ramin;Hajebi, Ahmad;Sefatian, Saeed;Zare-Bidoky, Mehran;Razaghi, Emran Mohammad;Mokri, Azarakhsh;Rahimi-Movaghar, Afarin;Rawson, Richard;
422 views DOI Abstract
2006
l'effet de serre par le co2 et les gaz traces greenhouse effect from co2 and trace gases
;Bertrand A.
Vol. 42 , No. 5 , pp. 655-669
411 views DOI Abstract
2011
Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review
Khadjesari Z;Murray E;Hewitt C;Hartley S;Godfrey C;;
Vol. 106 , No. 2 , pp. -
409 views Abstract
2019
Psychostimulant use disorder and the heart.
Duflou, Johan;
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of specialist and primary care stop smoking support on socioeconomic inequalities in cessation in the UK: a systematic review and national equity analysis.
Smith, Caroline E;Hill, Sarah E;Amos, Amanda;
399 views DOI Abstract
2018
Independent predictors of mortality in adolescents ascertained for conduct disorder and substance use problems, their siblings and community controls.
Border, Richard;Corley, Robin P;Brown, Sandra A;Hewitt, John K;Hopfer, Christian J;McWilliams, Shannon K;Rhea, Sally Ann;Shriver, Christen L;Stallings, Michael C;Wall, Tamara L;Woodward, Kerri E;Rhee, Soo Hyun;
Vol. 113 , No. 11 , pp. 2107-2115
393 views DOI Abstract
View All 124 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.