Indexed in Journament

addiction (abingdon, england)

ISSN 1360-0443· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,920 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
124 Articles
Scores higher than 49.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name addiction
Abbreviated Name addiction
ISSN 1360-0443
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13600443

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for addiction (abingdon, england)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 33.3 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 12.9 13.4
Content Distribution 75.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (124)

2009
Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature
Vol. 104 , No. 11 , pp. -
587 views Abstract
2019
The evolution of addiction treatment and harm reduction programs in Iran: a chaotic response or a synergistic diversity?
475 views DOI Abstract
2008
Web-based self-help for problem drinkers: a pragmatic randomized trial
Vol. 103 , No. 2 , pp. -
474 views Abstract
2002
The association between knowledge of hepatitis C virus status and risk behaviors in injection drug users
Vol. 97 , No. 10 , pp. -
460 views Abstract
2019
Psychostimulant use disorder and the heart.
455 views DOI Abstract
2018
Independent predictors of mortality in adolescents ascertained for conduct disorder and substance use problems, their siblings and community controls.
Vol. 113 , No. 11 , pp. 2107-2115
440 views DOI Abstract
2006
l'effet de serre par le co2 et les gaz traces greenhouse effect from co2 and trace gases
Vol. 42 , No. 5 , pp. 655-669
438 views DOI Abstract
2011
Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review
Vol. 106 , No. 2 , pp. -
432 views Abstract
2020
Titrated baclofen for high-risk alcohol consumption: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in out-patients with 1-year follow-up
Vol. 115 , No. 7 , pp. -
324 views Abstract
2020
Reply to comments on the Rigal et al. (2019) Bacloville trial
Vol. 115 , No. 11 , pp. -
301 views Abstract
2020
Restoring the Bacloville trial: efficacy and harms
Vol. 115 , No. 11 , pp. -
278 views Abstract
2020
Washington's privatization of liquor: effects on household alcohol purchases from Initiative 1183.
Vol. 115 , No. 4 , pp. 681-689
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluating the causal impact of individual alcohol licensing decisions on local health and crime using natural experiments with synthetic controls.
298 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cannabis Use and Stressful Life Events during the Perinatal Period: Cross-sectional Results from Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Data, 2016.
374 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of alcohol policy control measures is key.
181 views DOI
2020
The importance of loose tobacco when considering capping pack size.
307 views DOI
Journament Score
35.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,920 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.