american journal of physiology endocrinology and metabolism | Journament

Journal Ranking

#209 / 33,900
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 18 hours ago

american journal of physiology endocrinology and metabolism

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name am j physiol endocrinol metab
Abbreviated Name am j physiol endocrinol metab
ISSN 1522-1555
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (269 total)

2008
design aspects of printed monopole antennas for ultra-wide band applications
;K. P. Ray
Vol. 2008 , pp. -
578 views DOI Abstract
2014
design of compact 4 × 4 uwb-mimo antenna with wlan band rejection
;Nguyen Khac Kiem;Huynh Nguyen Bao Phuong;Dao Ngoc Chien
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
575 views DOI Abstract
2001
Dietary restriction and glucose regulation in aging rhesus monkeys: a follow-up report at 8.5 yr
Gresl TA;Colman RJ;Roecker EB;Havighurst TC;Huang Z;Allison DB;Bergman RN;Kemnitz JW;;
Vol. 281 , No. 4 , pp. -
496 views Abstract
2016
Plasma amino acid and metabolite signatures tracking diabetes progression in the UCD-T2DM rat model.
Piccolo, Brian D;Graham, James L;Stanhope, Kimber L;Fiehn, Oliver;Havel, Peter J;Adams, Sean H;
Vol. 310 , No. 11 , pp. E958-69
448 views DOI Abstract
2013
design of a printed dipole antenna array for a passive radar system
;Peter Knott
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Activation of Protein Synthesis, Regeneration and MAPK Signaling Pathways Following Repeated Bouts of Eccentric Cycling.
Valladares-Ide, Denisse;Peñailillo, Luis;Collao, Nicolás;Marambio, Hugo;Deldicque, Louise;Zbinden-Foncea, Hermann;
410 views DOI Abstract
2018
Insulin signaling displayed a differential tissue-specific response to low-dose dihydrotestosterone in female mice
Andrisse S;Billings K;Xue P;Wu S;;
Vol. 314 , No. 4 , pp. -
369 views Abstract
2019
1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D prevents renal oxidative damage via the PARP1/SIRT1/NOX4 pathway in Zucker diabetic fatty rats.
Wang, Dongxia;Li, Yanyan;Wang, Ning;Luo, Gang;Wang, Jun;Luo, Can;Yu, Wei;Hao, Liping;
342 views DOI Abstract
2012
design of high gain and broadband antennas at 60 ghz for underground communications systems
;Yacouba Coulibaly;Mourad Nedil;Larbi Talbi;Tayeb A. Denidni
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
319 views DOI Abstract
2015
experimental characterization and correlation analysis of indoor channels at 15 ghz
;Xin Zhou;Zhangdui Zhong;Bei Zhang;Ruisi He;Ke Guan;Qi Wang;David Matolak
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
316 views DOI Abstract
View All 269 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.