boletin latinoamericano y del caribe de plantas medicinales y aromaticas | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1897 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

boletin latinoamericano y del caribe de plantas medicinales y aromaticas

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name boletin latinoamericano y del caribe de plantas medicinales y aromaticas
Abbreviated Name boletin latinoamericano y del caribe de plantas medicinales y aromaticas
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2014
optimization of multi-response dynamic systems using principal component analysis (pca)-based utility theory approach
;Susanta Kumar Gauri
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 101-114
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethnobotany of passion flowers (Passiflora) in the Andean province of Angaraes (Huancavelica, Perú)
Castañeda, R.
Vol. 18 , pp. 27-41
316 views
2018
experimental investigation on hard turning using mixed ceramic insert under accelerated cooling environment
;Ramanuj Kumar;Ashok Kumar Sahoo;Purna Chandra Mishra;Rabin Kumar Das;Manoj Ukamanal
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 509-522
292 views DOI Abstract
2014
a response surface methodology and desirability approach for predictive modeling and optimization of cutting temperature in machining hardened steel
;Ashok Kumar Sahoo;Purna Chandra Mishra
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 407-416
289 views DOI Abstract
2017
strategic production modeling for defective items with imperfect inspection process, rework, and sales return under two-level trade credit
;Aditi Khanna;Aakanksha Kishore ;Chandra K. Jaggi
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 85-118
288 views DOI Abstract
2016
grasp to minimize total weighted tardiness in a permutation flow shop environment
;Lina Paola Molina-Sánchez;Eliana María González-Neira
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 161-176
285 views DOI Abstract
2011
a bsc-dea approach to measure the relative efficiency of service industry: a case study of banking sector
;M. B. Aryanezhad;E. Najafi;S. Bakhshi Farkoosh
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 273-282
277 views Abstract
2013
application of desirability function for optimizing the performance characteristics of carbonitrided bushes
;Boby John
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 305-314
255 views DOI Abstract
2014
an optimization of an inventory model of decaying-lot depleted by declining market demand and extended with discretely variable holding costs
;Ankit Prakash Tyagi
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 71-86
251 views DOI Abstract
2018
development of modified discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm for quadratic assignment problems
;T.G. Pradeepmon;R. Sridharan ;Vinay V. Panicker
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 491-508
243 views DOI Abstract
View All 24 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.