Indexed in Journament

journal of environmental planning and management

ISSN 0964-0568· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #4,822 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 83.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of environmental planning and management
Abbreviated Name journal of environmental planning and management
ISSN 0964-0568

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 15.0 19.1
Timeliness 50.0 9.2
Diversity 30.0 25.8
Innovation 40.0 27.4
Community Impact 33.5 7.8
Content Distribution 76.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2019
Strategic delta planning: launching new ideas on managing a Delta, and their travels along actor coalitions, participatory planning tools and implementation timelines
Korbee, D.
Vol. 62 , pp. 1447-1453
311 views DOI
2013
Social learning in collaborative watershed planning: the importance of process control and efficacy
Tomas M. Koontz;Tomas M. Koontz;
Vol. 57 , No. 10 , pp. 1572-1593
293 views DOI
2020
GIS-based forest fire risk mapping using the analytical network process and fuzzy logic
Abedi, Gheshlaghi H.
Vol. 63 , pp. 481-499
278 views DOI
2020
Information, technology, and digitalization in China’s environmental governance
Kostka, G.
Vol. 63 , pp. 1-13
263 views DOI
2019
What drives household recovery after disasters? A case study of New York City after 2012 Hurricane Sandy
Chandrasekhar, D.
Vol. 62 , pp. 1249-1268
263 views DOI
2019
Do species-poor forests fool conservation policies? Assessing the role of forests, biodiversity and income in global conservation efforts
Lawson, L.
, pp. 0-0
251 views DOI
2019
A synthesis on strategic delta planning in action: wishful thinking, vested practices and unexpected changes
Seijger, C.
Vol. 62 , pp. 1654-1674
241 views DOI
2020
ARIMA models as an alternative to predict the diffusion of the ISO 14001 standard in Europe
Sousa, Lira J.
Vol. 63 , pp. 275-286
238 views DOI
2012
Volunteer participation in collaborative watershed partnerships: insights from the Theory of Planned Behaviour
Bradley K. Hauser,Tomas M. Koontz,Jeremy T. Bruskotter;Bradley K. Hauser;Tomas M. Koontz;Jeremy T. Bruskotter;
Vol. 55 , No. 1 , pp. 77-94
229 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on corporate sustainability with mediating role of CSR: analysis from the Asian context
Shahzad, M.
Vol. 63 , pp. 148-174
198 views DOI
2020
Impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on corporate sustainability with mediating role of CSR: analysis from the Asian context
Shahzad, M.
Vol. 63 , pp. 148-174
198 views DOI
2020
Sustainable competitiveness: a spatial econometric analysis of European regions
Möbius, P.
Vol. 63 , pp. 453-480
91 views DOI
2020
GIS-based forest fire risk mapping using the analytical network process and fuzzy logic
Abedi, Gheshlaghi H.
Vol. 63 , pp. 481-499
278 views DOI
2020
GIS-based suitability analysis using fuzzy PROMETHEE
Vavatsikos, A.
Vol. 63 , pp. 604-628
124 views DOI
2020
Information, technology, and digitalization in China’s environmental governance
Kostka, G.
Vol. 63 , pp. 1-13
263 views DOI
2020
ARIMA models as an alternative to predict the diffusion of the ISO 14001 standard in Europe
Sousa, Lira J.
Vol. 63 , pp. 275-286
238 views DOI
2019
What drives household recovery after disasters? A case study of New York City after 2012 Hurricane Sandy
Chandrasekhar, D.
Vol. 62 , pp. 1249-1268
263 views DOI
2019
Do species-poor forests fool conservation policies? Assessing the role of forests, biodiversity and income in global conservation efforts
Lawson, L.
, pp. 0-0
251 views DOI
2019
A synthesis on strategic delta planning in action: wishful thinking, vested practices and unexpected changes
Seijger, C.
Vol. 62 , pp. 1654-1674
241 views DOI
2019
Strategic delta planning: launching new ideas on managing a Delta, and their travels along actor coalitions, participatory planning tools and implementation timelines
Korbee, D.
Vol. 62 , pp. 1447-1453
311 views DOI
Journament Score
39.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #4,822 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.