integrative medicine research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5347 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

integrative medicine research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name integr med res
Abbreviated Name integr med res
ISSN 2213-4220
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/integrative-medicine-research
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2017
Current status and future prospects of research and development operations in traditional and complementary and alternative medicine manufacturing small- and medium-sized enterprises: a 2014 company-based survey
Ahn, Miyoung;Park, Eun-Ji;Woo, Jong-Min;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 409-417
412 views Abstract
2017
Studies on jackfruit seed starch as a novel natural superdisintegrant for the design and evaluation of irbesartan fast dissolving tablets.
Suryadevara, Vidyadhara;Lankapalli, Sasidhar Reddyvallam;Danda, Lakshmi Harika;Pendyala, Vijetha;Katta, Vijetha;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 280-291
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
A mechanical acupuncture instrument mitigates the endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress of ovariectomized rats.
Seo, Su Yeon;Kang, Suk Yun;Kwon, O Sang;Bang, Se Kyun;Kim, Soo Phil;Choi, Kwang-Ho;Moon, Ji Young;Ryu, Yeonhee;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 187-194
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethnomedicine of Tetun ethnic people in West Timor Indonesia; philosophy and practice in the treatment of malaria.
Taek, Maximus M;Banilodu, Leonardus;Neonbasu, Gregorius;Watu, Yohanes Vianney;E W, Bambang Prajogo;Agil, Mangestuti;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 139-144
338 views DOI Abstract
2017
Pharmacognostic outlooks on medical herbs of Sasang typology.
Lim, Su Hye;Jeon, Eun Sang;Lee, Jeongyun;Han, Sang Yun;Chae, Han;
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 231-239
300 views DOI Abstract
2020
Efficacy and safety of herbal medicine (Lianhuaqingwen) for treating COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu, Ming;Ya, Gao;Yuan, Yuan;Yang, Kelu;Shi, Shuzhen;Tian, Jinhui;Zhang, Junhua;
, pp. 100644
299 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evidence mapping of interactions on concomitant use of Chinese medicine and platinum-based chemotherapy: a scoping review protocol.
Liew, Ai Ch'i;Chan, Si Yan;Lim, Ren Jye;Nabil, Wan Najbah Nik;Hoo, Shi Min;Lai, Nai Ming;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 100392
284 views DOI Abstract
1993
the automation of speech parts inflexion process
;E. Boian;A. Danilchenco;L. Topal
Vol. 1 , No. 2(2) , pp. 14-48
281 views Abstract
1993
development of the hybrid expert system shell synthesis for the problems of research design of technical objects
;A. Alexeyev;A. Borisov;S. Fomin;N. Slyadz;E. Vilums
Vol. 1 , No. 1(1) , pp. 53-61
279 views Abstract
2001
collective expertise through the prism of network technologies
;Vsevolod Arnaut
Vol. 9 , No. 2(26) , pp. 198-207
266 views Abstract
View All 39 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.