Indexed in Journament

integrative medicine research

ISSN 2213-4220· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.7/100
Journament Score
#10,234
Journament Rank
39
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name integr med res
Abbreviated Name integr med res
ISSN 2213-4220
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/integrative-medicine-research

Indexings

ncbi doaj

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2017
Studies on jackfruit seed starch as a novel natural superdisintegrant for the design and evaluation of irbesartan fast dissolving tablets.
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 280-291
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
A mechanical acupuncture instrument mitigates the endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress of ovariectomized rats.
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 187-194
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethnomedicine of Tetun ethnic people in West Timor Indonesia; philosophy and practice in the treatment of malaria.
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 139-144
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Efficacy and safety of herbal medicine (Lianhuaqingwen) for treating COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
, pp. 100644
314 views DOI Abstract
2017
Pharmacognostic outlooks on medical herbs of Sasang typology.
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 231-239
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evidence mapping of interactions on concomitant use of Chinese medicine and platinum-based chemotherapy: a scoping review protocol.
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 100392
305 views DOI Abstract
1993
development of the hybrid expert system shell synthesis for the problems of research design of technical objects
Vol. 1 , No. 1(1) , pp. 53-61
292 views Abstract
1993
the automation of speech parts inflexion process
Vol. 1 , No. 2(2) , pp. 14-48
291 views Abstract
2001
collective expertise through the prism of network technologies
Vol. 9 , No. 2(26) , pp. 198-207
281 views Abstract
2020
Efficacy and safety of herbal medicine (Lianhuaqingwen) for treating COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
, pp. 100644
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evidence mapping of interactions on concomitant use of Chinese medicine and platinum-based chemotherapy: a scoping review protocol.
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 100392
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
A mechanical acupuncture instrument mitigates the endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress of ovariectomized rats.
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 187-194
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethnomedicine of Tetun ethnic people in West Timor Indonesia; philosophy and practice in the treatment of malaria.
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 139-144
353 views DOI Abstract
2018
about international conference miti2018
Vol. 26 , No. 1(76) , pp. 95-96
65 views Abstract
2017
Studies on jackfruit seed starch as a novel natural superdisintegrant for the design and evaluation of irbesartan fast dissolving tablets.
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 280-291
427 views DOI Abstract
2017
Pharmacognostic outlooks on medical herbs of Sasang typology.
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 231-239
314 views DOI Abstract
2016
the general prioritization framework
Vol. 24 , No. 2(71) , pp. 192-201
130 views Abstract
2015
bounds on global total domination in graphs
Vol. 23 , No. 1(67) , pp. 3-10
1 views Abstract
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

35.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.