Indexed in Journament

biosaintifika: journal of biology & biology education

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,109 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
47 Articles
Scores higher than 24.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name biosaintifika: journal of biology & biology education
Abbreviated Name biosaintifika: journal of biology & biology education
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.1
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 52.5
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 48.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for biosaintifika: journal of biology & biology education
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 52.5 25.7
Community Impact 5.7 5.8
Content Distribution 48.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (47)

normative need for orthodontic treatment and perception of the need for such treatment among brazilian adolescents
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 41-46
609 views DOI Abstract
2013
in vitro evaluation of force degradation of elastomeric chains used in orthodontics
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 55-62
546 views Abstract
2012
the ability of orthodontists and laypeople in the perception of gradual reduction of dentogingival exposure while smiling
Vol. 17 , No. 5 , pp. 81-86
503 views DOI Abstract
2013
cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study
Vol. 18 , No. 5 , pp. 53-58
405 views DOI Abstract
2014
Studi Etnobotani Pengobatan Tradisional untuk Perawatan Wanita di Masyarakat Keraton Surakarta Hadiningrat
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 61-69
373 views Abstract
2011
avaliação do efeito de tratamentos superficiais sobre a força de adesão de braquetes em provisórios de resina acrílica assessment of the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of brackets bonded to acrylic resin
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 37-47
372 views DOI Abstract
high-intensity laser application in orthodontics
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 99-109
356 views DOI Abstract
2015
enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 61-67
336 views DOI Abstract
2015
researchers propose a protocol to recognize and treat mouth breathing in children
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. 1-1
159 views
2015
enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 61-67
336 views DOI Abstract
2015
early treatment of patient with class iii skeletal and dental patterns
Vol. 20 , No. 6 , pp. 97-109
132 views DOI Abstract
2015
assessment of upper airways measurements in patients with mandibular skeletal class ii malocclusion
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 86-93
176 views DOI Abstract
2014
writing a scientific paper: where to start from?
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 01-01
45 views DOI
2014
reasons for mini-implants failure: choosing installation site should be valued!
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 18-24
86 views DOI Abstract
2014
dentoskeletal effects of class ii malocclusion treatment with the twin block appliance in a brazilian sample: a prospective study
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 36-45
214 views DOI Abstract
2014
compensatory orthodontic treatment of skeletal class iii malocclusion with anterior crossbite
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 113-122
164 views DOI Abstract
2014
Studi Etnobotani Pengobatan Tradisional untuk Perawatan Wanita di Masyarakat Keraton Surakarta Hadiningrat
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 61-69
373 views Abstract
2013
cephalometric evaluation of the predictability of bimaxillary surgical-orthodontic treatment outcomes in long face pattern patients: a retrospective study
Vol. 18 , No. 5 , pp. 53-58
405 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,109 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

48.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.