Indexed in Journament

Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
53.3 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #13 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
124 Articles
Scores higher than 99.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Ethnobiol Ethnomed
Abbreviated Name journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 60.0
Diversity 79.8
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 14.3
Content Distribution 60.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 60.0 9.2
Diversity 79.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 14.3 7.8
Content Distribution 60.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (124)

2009
Commercial activities and subsistence utilization of mangrove forests around the Wouri estuary and the Douala-Edea reserve (Cameroon)
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 35-
618 views Abstract
2007
Ethnoveterinary medicines used for ruminants in British Columbia, Canada
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
591 views Abstract
2011
2010
Traditional herbal medicine in Far-west Nepal: a pharmacological appraisal
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 35-
496 views Abstract
2017
Use of cultivated plants and non-plant remedies for human and animal home-medication in Liubań district, Belarus.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 54
493 views DOI Abstract
2019
Building partnerships for linking biomedical science with traditional knowledge of customary medicines: a case study with two Australian Indigenous communities.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 69
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
Traditional knowledge and cultural importance of Gardenia erubescens Stapf & Hutch. in Sudanian savanna of Burkina Faso.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 28
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
From medicinal plant to noxious weed: Bryonia alba L. (Cucurbitaceae) in northern and eastern Europe.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 22
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
The value chain of the edible caterpillar Elaphrodes lactea Gaede (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae) in the Miombo forest of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 39
423 views DOI Abstract
2017
Functional diversity of home gardens and their agrobiodiversity conservation benefits in Benin, West Africa.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 66
423 views DOI Abstract
2024
Ethnoveterinary medicinal plants and their utilization by the people of Soro District, Hadiya Zone, southern Ethiopia.
Vol. 20 , pp. 21
59 views DOI Abstract
2020
assessing the effect of grit and employability on organizational commitment mediating by job involvement
Vol. 10 , No. 11 , pp. -
260 views DOI Abstract
2020
firm heterogeneity and total factor productivity: new panel-data evidence from vietnamese manufacturing firms
Vol. 10 , No. 7 , pp. 1505-1512
214 views DOI Abstract
2020
Management, morphological and genetic diversity of domesticated agaves in Michoacán, México.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 3
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mapping from spatial meaning: bridging Hñahñu (Otomi) ecological knowledge and geo-information tools.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 49
203 views DOI Abstract
2019
Building partnerships for linking biomedical science with traditional knowledge of customary medicines: a case study with two Australian Indigenous communities.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 69
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Ethnobotanical research in Cava de' Tirreni area, Southern Italy.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 50
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Plants in alcoholic beverages on the Croatian islands, with special reference to rakija travarica.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 51
358 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
53.3/100 · Average
Ranked #13 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

53.3/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

79.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.