molecular biology reports | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1533 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

molecular biology reports

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name mol biol rep
Abbreviated Name molecular biology reports
ISSN 1573-4978
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/11033
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (49 total)

2009
guideline implementation in clinical practice: use of statistical process control charts as visual feedback devices
;Fahad A Al-Hussein
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 11-17
583 views Abstract
2019
SRAPs and EST-SSRs provide useful molecular diversity for targeting drought and salinity tolerance in Indian mustard.
Saini, Prince;Kamboj, Disha;Yadav, R C;Yadav, Neelam R;
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evolutionary aspects of direct or indirect selection for seed size and seed metabolites in Brassica juncea and diploid progenitor species.
Sra, Simarjeet Kaur;Sharma, Meha;Kaur, Gurpreet;Sharma, Sanjula;Akhatar, Javed;Sharma, Anju;Banga, S S;
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Downregulation of TCEAL7 expression induces CCND1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer.
Orhan, Ceren;Bulut, Pelin;Dalay, Nejat;Ersen, Ezel;Buyru, Nur;
410 views DOI Abstract
2007
level and determinants of infant and under-five mortality in wad-medani town, sudan
;Huda M Haroun;Mohmamed S Mahfouz;Khalid H Ibrahim
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 65-69
394 views Abstract
2019
Synthesis and preclinical investigation of Tc-p-SCN-Bzl-DTPA-cetuximab for targeting EGFR using head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) xenografts.
Shah, Syed Qaiser;Gul-E-Raana, ;
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. 1675-1682
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of pomegranate aril juice and its punicalagin on some key regulators of insulin resistance and oxidative liver injury in streptozotocin-nicotinamide type 2 diabetic rats.
El-Beih, Nadia M;Ramadan, Gamal;El-Husseiny, Enas A;Hussein, Aya M;
Vol. 46 , No. 4 , pp. 3701-3711
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Strain identification and metabolites isolation of Aspergillus capensis CanS-34A from Brassica napus
Qin, J.
Vol. 46 , pp. 3451-3460
378 views DOI
2019
Newly isolated marine bacterial exopolysaccharides enhance antitumor activity in HepG2 cells via affecting key apoptotic factors and activating toll like receptors.
Yahya, Shaymaa M M;Abdelnasser, Salma M;Hamed, Ahmad R;El Sayed, Osama H;Asker, Mohsen S;
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Microbial community structure in the rhizosphere of the orphan legume Kersting’s groundnut [Macrotyloma geocarpum (Harms) Marechal & Baudet]
Jaiswal, S.
Vol. 46 , pp. 4471-4481
342 views DOI
View All 49 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.