Indexed in Journament

food additives & contaminants part a, chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment

ISSN 1944-0057· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,001 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
79 Articles
Scores higher than 11.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name food addit contam part a chem anal control expo risk assess
Abbreviated Name food addit contam part a chem anal control expo risk assess
ISSN 1944-0057
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tfac20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for food additives & contaminants part a, chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.7 13.4
Content Distribution 59.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (79)

2017
Moulds and mycotoxins detected in the regional speciality fermented sausage 'slavonski kulen' during a 1-year production period.
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 282-290
427 views DOI Abstract
2018
Time-resolved fluorescent immunochromatographic assay-based on three antibody labels for the simultaneous detection of aflatoxin B and zearalenone in Chinese herbal medicines.
Vol. 35 , No. 12 , pp. 2434-2442
422 views DOI Abstract
2020
High-throughput simultaneous analysis of multiple pesticides in grain, fruit, and vegetables by GC-MS/MS.
, pp. 1-10
417 views DOI Abstract
2018
The potential application of European market research data in dietary exposure modelling of food additives.
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 412-424
408 views DOI Abstract
2018
Zearalenone reduction by commercial peroxidase enzyme and peroxidases from soybean bran and rice bran.
Vol. 35 , No. 9 , pp. 1819-1831
403 views DOI Abstract
2016
A novel chemometric classification for FTIR spectra of mycotoxin-contaminated maize and peanuts at regulatory limits.
Vol. 33 , No. 10 , pp. 1596-1607
395 views Abstract
2019
Aflatoxins distribution in fractions derived from tofu production.
, pp. 1-8
372 views DOI Abstract
2018
Subcritical water extraction of thyreostats from bovine muscle followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Vol. 35 , No. 8 , pp. 1472-1483
371 views DOI Abstract
2012
Changes in time of sowing, flowering and maturity of cereals in Europe under climate change.
Vol. 29 , No. 10 , pp. 1527-42
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
High-throughput simultaneous analysis of multiple pesticides in grain, fruit, and vegetables by GC-MS/MS.
, pp. 1-10
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
Nickel in foods sampled on the Belgian market: identification of potential contamination sources.
, pp. 1-15
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessment of the combined nitrate and nitrite exposure from food and drinking water: application of uncertainty around the nitrate to nitrite conversion factor.
, pp. 1-15
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gluten contamination in manufactured gluten-free foods in Turkey.
, pp. 1-11
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aflatoxins distribution in fractions derived from tofu production.
, pp. 1-8
372 views DOI Abstract
2018
review: posthumanism and massive open online course contaminating the subject of global education
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 247-249
123 views Abstract
2018
instructional design to measure the efficacy of interactive e-books in a high school setting
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 47-60
204 views DOI Abstract
2018
in-service teachers’ internet self-efficacy: a re-examination of gender differences
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 72-85
164 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,001 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.