food additives & contaminants part a, chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2940 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

food additives & contaminants part a, chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name food addit contam part a chem anal control expo risk assess
Abbreviated Name food addit contam part a chem anal control expo risk assess
ISSN 1944-0057
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tfac20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (79 total)

2020
High-throughput simultaneous analysis of multiple pesticides in grain, fruit, and vegetables by GC-MS/MS.
, pp. 1-10
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
The potential application of European market research data in dietary exposure modelling of food additives.
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 412-424
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
Time-resolved fluorescent immunochromatographic assay-based on three antibody labels for the simultaneous detection of aflatoxin B and zearalenone in Chinese herbal medicines.
Vol. 35 , No. 12 , pp. 2434-2442
356 views DOI Abstract
2017
Moulds and mycotoxins detected in the regional speciality fermented sausage 'slavonski kulen' during a 1-year production period.
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 282-290
355 views DOI Abstract
2016
A novel chemometric classification for FTIR spectra of mycotoxin-contaminated maize and peanuts at regulatory limits.
Vol. 33 , No. 10 , pp. 1596-1607
351 views Abstract
2018
Zearalenone reduction by commercial peroxidase enzyme and peroxidases from soybean bran and rice bran.
Vol. 35 , No. 9 , pp. 1819-1831
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aflatoxins distribution in fractions derived from tofu production.
, pp. 1-8
332 views DOI Abstract
2018
Subcritical water extraction of thyreostats from bovine muscle followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Vol. 35 , No. 8 , pp. 1472-1483
318 views DOI Abstract
2012
Changes in time of sowing, flowering and maturity of cereals in Europe under climate change.
Vol. 29 , No. 10 , pp. 1527-42
312 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.