Indexed in Journament

hydrogeology journal

ISSN 1431-2174· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,011 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 4.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name hydrogeol j
Abbreviated Name hydrogeology journal
ISSN 1431-2174
URL https://www.springer.com/10040

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 11.1 28.8
Innovation 28.5 31.2
Community Impact 7.1 13.4
Content Distribution 64.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2018
Editor’s Message: US Environmental Protection Agency’s Coal Combustion Residuals Rule strengthens regulatory recognition of karst groundwater flow
Groves C.
Vol. 26 , pp. 361-365
433 views DOI
2019
Usefulness of historical measurements of tritium content in groundwater for recharge assessment in semi-arid regions: application to several aquifers in central Tunisia
Jerbi, H.
Vol. 27 , pp. 1645-1660
371 views DOI
2019
Variation in groundwater recharge and surface-water quality due to climatic extremes in semi-arid mountainous watersheds
Newman, C.
Vol. 27 , pp. 1627-1643
353 views DOI
2019
Hydrogeology of an arid endorheic basin (Tsagaan Els, Dornogobi, Mongolia): field data and conceptualization, three-dimensional groundwater modeling, and water budget
Grizard, P.
Vol. 27 , pp. 145-160
349 views DOI
2018
The need for a standard approach to assessing the functionality of rural community water supplies.
Bonsor, Helen;MacDonald, Alan;Casey, Vincent;Carter, Richard;Wilson, Paul;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 367-370
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Application of electrical resistivity tomography for delineating permafrost hydrogeology in the headwater area of Yellow River on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, SW China
Gao, S.
Vol. 27 , pp. 1725-1737
338 views DOI
2019
Chaos theory applied to the modelling of karst springs: first results from univariate time series
Mangiarotti, S.
Vol. 27 , pp. 2027-2043
333 views DOI
2019
Hydrogeology and geochemistry of a tectonically controlled, deep-seated and semi-fossil aquifer in the Zambezi Region (Namibia)
Bäumle, R.
Vol. 27 , pp. 885-914
308 views DOI
2019
Modeling groundwater contaminant transport in the presence of large heterogeneity: A case study comparing MT3D and RWhet.
Guo, Zhilin;Fogg, Graham E;Brusseau, Mark L;LaBolle, Eric M;Lopez, Jose;
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 1363-1371
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hydrogeology of a weathered fractured aquifer system near Gitega, Burundi
Vassolo, S.
Vol. 27 , pp. 625-637
289 views DOI
2021
Hydrochemistry and environmental isotopes of spring water and their relation to structure and lithology identified with remote sensing methods in Wadi Araba, Egypt
Wannous, M.
Vol. 29 , pp. 2245-2266
78 views DOI
2020
Correction: Impact of river reconstruction on groundwater flow during bank filtration assessed by transient three-dimensional modelling of flow and heat transport (Hydrogeology Journal, (2019), 10.1007/s10040-019-02063-3)
Wang, W.
, pp. 0-0
237 views DOI
2019
Modeling groundwater contaminant transport in the presence of large heterogeneity: A case study comparing MT3D and RWhet.
Guo, Zhilin;Fogg, Graham E;Brusseau, Mark L;LaBolle, Eric M;Lopez, Jose;
Vol. 27 , No. 4 , pp. 1363-1371
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Chaos theory applied to the modelling of karst springs: first results from univariate time series
Mangiarotti, S.
Vol. 27 , pp. 2027-2043
333 views DOI
2019
Correction to: Laboratory and numerical study of hyporheic flow-mediated DNAPL dissolution in karst conduits (Hydrogeology Journal, (2019), 27, 1, (335-343), 10.1007/s10040-018-1858-3)
Wu, Y.
Vol. 27 , pp. 435
205 views DOI
2019
Hydrogeology of an arid endorheic basin (Tsagaan Els, Dornogobi, Mongolia): field data and conceptualization, three-dimensional groundwater modeling, and water budget
Grizard, P.
Vol. 27 , pp. 145-160
349 views DOI
2019
Correction to: Push-pull tests for estimating effective porosity: expanded analytical solution and in situ application (Hydrogeology Journal, (2018), 26, 2, (381-393), 10.1007/s10040-017-1672-3)
Paradis, C.
Vol. 27 , pp. 437-439
239 views DOI
2019
Hydrogeology of a weathered fractured aquifer system near Gitega, Burundi
Vassolo, S.
Vol. 27 , pp. 625-637
289 views DOI
2019
Hydrogeology and geochemistry of a tectonically controlled, deep-seated and semi-fossil aquifer in the Zambezi Region (Namibia)
Bäumle, R.
Vol. 27 , pp. 885-914
308 views DOI
2019
Water quality and physical hydrogeology of the Amarapura township, Mandalay, Myanmar
Grzybowski, M.
Vol. 27 , pp. 1497-1513
202 views DOI
Journament Score
24.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,011 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

24.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

28.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.