chemical papers | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2479 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

chemical papers

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name chemical papers
Abbreviated Name chemical papers
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/11696
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2016
determination of phenolic acids in seeds of black cumin, flax, pomegranate and pumpkin and their by-products
;Krimer-Malešević Vera M.;Poša Mihalj M.;Stolić Žužana G.;Popović Ljiljana M.;Peričin-Starčević Ivana R.
Vol. 2016 , No. 47 , pp. 19-28
341 views DOI Abstract
2018
Structural basis of pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives as CAMKIIδ kinase inhibitors: insights from 3D QSAR, docking studies and in silico ADMET evaluation
Aouidate, A.
Vol. 72 , pp. 2833-2847
296 views DOI
2019
Development and validation of an assay method for benzene in the delgocitinib drug substance using conventional HPLC
Nomura, S.
Vol. 73 , pp. 673-681
286 views DOI
2019
Development of heat and mass transfer correlations and recovery calculation for HCl–water azeotropic separation using air gap membrane distillation
Kalla, S.
Vol. 73 , pp. 2449-2460
283 views DOI
2011
influence of fermentation temperature on the content of fatty acids in low energy milk-based kombucha products
;Malbaša Radomir V.;Vitas Jasmina S.;Lončar Eva S.;Kravić Snežana Ž.
Vol. 2011 , No. 42 , pp. 81-90
283 views DOI Abstract
2013
Synthesis and spectroscopic characterisation of (E)-2-(2-(9-(4-(1H-1,2,4- triazol-1-yl)butyl)-9H-carbazol-3-yl)vinyl)-3-ethylbenzo[d]thiazol-3-ium, a new ligand and potential DNA intercalator
Głuszyńska A.
Vol. 67 , pp. 1231-1239
264 views DOI
2015
optimization of alcoholic fermentation using immobilized yeast cells in calcium alginate gel
;Đuran Jovana J.;Rončević Zorana Z.;Bajić Bojana Ž.;Dodić Siniša N.;Grahovac Jovana A.;Jokić Aleksandar I.;Dodić Jelena M.
Vol. 2015 , No. 46 , pp. 207-218
259 views DOI Abstract
2002
determina tion of diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione in beer by gc/ms using solid-phase extraction columns
;Pejin Jelena D.;Grujić Olgica S.;Marjanović Nikola J.;Vujić Đura N.;Kocić-Tanackov Sunčica D.
Vol. 2002 , No. 33 , pp. 45-54
259 views DOI Abstract
2014
testing methods for antimicrobial activity of tio2 photocatalyst
;Markov Siniša L.;Vidaković Ana M.
Vol. 2014 , No. 45 , pp. 141-152
247 views DOI Abstract
2018
Synthesis, molecular docking, and evaluation of novel bivalent pyrazolinyl-1,2,3-triazoles as potential VEGFR TK inhibitors and anti-cancer agents
Abd-Rabou, A.
Vol. 72 , pp. 2225-2237
242 views DOI
View All 29 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.